Literature DB >> 8809385

Comparison of efficacy of sulbactam: ampicillin to ampicillin and saline for treatment of experimentally induced Escherichia coli diarrhea in neonatal calves.

J Lofstedt1, L Miller, G Duizer, J Daley.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the efficacy of sulbactam: ampicillin (SAMP) (3.3:6.6 mg/kg body weight (BW), IM, q24 h) to that of ampicillin trihydrate (AMP) (6 mg/kg BW, IM, q24 h) and 0.9% saline (SAL) (3 mL IM, q24 h) for the treatment of diarrhea in calves induced by oral inoculation with Escherichia coli strain B44 (O9:K30:K99:H-). Treatment was initiated when severe diarrhea was noted (T0) and continued for at least 3 d; or for 24 h after clinical signs resolved; or for a maximum duration of 7 d. Starting at T0, calves were examined twice daily: appetite; rectal temperature (TEMP); and fecal consistency (FECAL), mental status (ATTD), eye position (EYE), and skin elasticity (SKIN) scores were recorded. Feces collected at T0 were submitted for bacteriology, electron microscopy, and parasitology. A complete blood count was performed at T0 and T3 (24 h after third treatment). Severely dehydrated, depressed, and anorexic calves were euthanized and considered mortalities. Cause of death was determined by post mortem examination. A total of 30 calves were included in the study. Three calves were excluded from final analysis. E. coli strain B44 was cultured from feces of all calves at T0. At T2 (24 h after second treatment) mean TEMP of SAMP calves was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than mean TEMP of SAL calves; EYE and SKIN scores of SAMP calves were significantly lower (P < alpha beta = 0.025) than those of SAL and AMP calves; and ATTD and FECAL scores of SAMP calves were significantly lower (P < alpha beta = 0.025) than in SAL calves. At T3, SAMP calves had significantly lower (P < 0.05) mean hematocrit than SAL calves and lower mean total plasma protein concentration than AMP and SAL calves. Mean fibrinogen concentration in SAMP calves at T3 was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that of calves receiving either SAL or AMP. The number of surviving SAMP calves (10/10) was significantly higher (P < alpha beta = 0.025) than the number of surviving SAL calves (2/9), but not significantly different from the surviving AMP calves (3/8).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8809385      PMCID: PMC1263835     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  13 in total

1.  The role of management and the use of vaccines in the control of acute undifferentiated diarrhea of newborn calves.

Authors:  O M Radostits
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Plasma total protein measurement for prediction of disease and mortality in calves.

Authors:  J M Naylor; D S Kronfeld; S Bech-Nielsen; R C Bartholomew
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1977-10-01       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Adverse effect of oral antibacterial prophylaxis and therapy on incidence of neonatal calf diarrhea.

Authors:  J J Shull; H M Frederick
Journal:  Vet Med Small Anim Clin       Date:  1978-07

4.  Neonatal diarrhoea in calves.

Authors:  J W Boyd; J R Baker; A Leyland
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1974-10-05       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Observations on the immune globulin levels of neonatal calves and their relationship to disease.

Authors:  A D McEwan; E W Fisher; I E Selman
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.311

6.  Factors influencing dairy calf mortality in Michigan.

Authors:  W D Oxender; L E Newman; D A Morrow
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1973-03-15       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Antibiotics and calf diarrhoea--the effect of serum immune globulin concentrations.

Authors:  E W Fisher; G H De la Fuente
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1971-11-27       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Causes and costs of calf mortality in Colorado beef herds participating in the National Animal Health Monitoring System.

Authors:  T E Wittum; M D Salman; K G Odde; R G Mortimer; M E King
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 9.  Therapeutic agents used in the treatment of calf diarrhea.

Authors:  P C Mullowney; W H Patterson
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Efficacy of sulbactam-ampicillin in the treatment of neonatal calf diarrhoea.

Authors:  W T Grimshaw; P J Colman; L Petrie
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1987-08-22       Impact factor: 2.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.