Literature DB >> 8807651

Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.

J Rabin1, J Wicks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that small letter contrast sensitivity (CS) is more sensitive than visual acuity (VA) to defocus, luminance, binocular enhancement, and visual differences among pilot trainees. It would be valuable to make this test available for general use. We developed a hard copy (letter chart) version called the Small Letter Contrast Test (SLCT) and evaluated its sensitivity and reliability in comparison to standard vision tests.
METHODS: The SLCT has 14 lines of letters with 10 letters per line. The letters are of constant size (20/25 or 4/5 at 4 m), but vary in contrast by line in 0.1 log steps (0.01 log units per letter). Normal room illumination is used. The SLCT was evaluated in 16 subjects under various conditions (spherical and astigmatic blur, low luminance, 2 eyes vs. 1 eye) to determine test sensitivity and reliability, and in patients with clinical conditions. Scores were compared to those obtained with standard tests of VA (Bailey-Lovie) and CS (Pelli-Robson).
RESULTS: SLCT scores were similar to previous measures, and retest reliability was one line. The SLCT was more sensitive than VA to spherical and astigmatic blur, low luminance, and vision with two eyes vs. one eye. Greater sensitivity of the SLCT endured despite correction for variability. The SLCT was more sensitive than standard tests to visual loss from early cataract, keratoconus, corneal infiltrates, edema, and amblyopia.
CONCLUSIONS: The SLCT is a sensitive, adjunctive test, which complements existing measures of VA. It can reveal subtle visual deficits that may be undetected by standard clinical techniques. The SLCT should prove useful for monitoring vision in refractive surgery, corneal and macular edema, optic neuritis, and for selection and evaluation of candidates for occupations requiring unique visual abilities like aviation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807651     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199606000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  5 in total

1.  Contrast and glare testing in keratoconus and after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; P Schoneveld; R J Seto; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Contrast sensitivity and visual hallucinations in patients referred to a low vision rehabilitation clinic.

Authors:  August Colenbrander; Donald C Fletcher
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  [Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; J Bühren; M Cichocki; T Kasper; E Terzi; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Precision and Normative Values of a New Computerized Chart for Contrast Sensitivity Testing.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Antonio Calossi; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Piero Barboni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.