Literature DB >> 8807643

Abdominal incisions from creation to closure.

I E Nygaard1, R C Squatrito.   

Abstract

Many of the techniques involved in creating and closing a surgical incision are based on tradition. Over the last several decades, randomized studies have addressed some of the steps in this process. Animal data and human data often have conflicting results. Randomized trials in human subjects indicate: 1) The incision can be made with one, rather than two, scalpels. 2) There is no advantage to using a laser rather than a scalpel when creating the incision. 3) Subcutaneous Penrose drains carried through the incision increase the infection rate. Closed suction drains in the subcutaneous space are rarely indicated. 4) The surgeon does not need to close peritoneum. 5) Time can be saved by closing the fascia in a continuous rather than interrupted fashion without causing an increase in postoperative wound separation or hernia formation. 6) Closing Camper's fascia after a cesarean delivery reduces the incidence of wound separation. 7) The cosmetic appearance of an incision is not improved by closing skin in a subcuticular rather than interrupted fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807643     DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199607000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  4 in total

1.  [Incision and closure of the abdominal wall].

Authors:  M Bolli; M Schilling
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Prevalence of diastasis recti abdominis in a urogynecological patient population.

Authors:  Theresa M Spitznagle; Fah Che Leong; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-26

3.  Healing comparison of porcine cutaneous incisions made with cold steel scalpel, standard electrosurgical blade, and a novel tissue dissector.

Authors:  Albert Y Wu; Thomas J Baldwin; Bhupendra C Patel; Jeffrey W Clymer; Ryan D Lewis
Journal:  Med Res Innov       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 4.  Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Igor Immerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.