Literature DB >> 8807386

The telephone survey method: a discussion paper.

K L Barriball1, S L Christian, A E While, A Bergen.   

Abstract

The telephone survey method is discussed in the light of the experiences of one research team investigating case management practices among nurses working in the community using a multiple-method design. An account is given of the strategies employed to recruit a study sample, minimize non-response and bias and ensure the use of sound practices during data collection. The findings highlight the benefits of using the telephone survey method when recruiting respondents across a wide geographical area and/or working within a continually changing environment. However, the findings also highlight the challenge of non-response caused by non-contact and the resource implications of 'doing more' to recruit key informants via the telephone.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807386     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.17016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  Brief report: telephone administration of the autism diagnostic interview--revised: reliability and suitability for use in research.

Authors:  Jessica Ward-King; Ira L Cohen; Henderika Penning; Jeanette J A Holden
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Alcohol consumption in pregnancy: results from the general practice setting.

Authors:  A Ní Shúilleabháin; J Barry; A Kelly; F O'Kelly; C Darker; T O'Dowd
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  A telephone survey of cancer awareness among frontline staff: informing training needs.

Authors:  N Cook; A Hart; K Nuttall; K Simpson; N Turnill; C Grant-Pearce; P Damms; V Allen; K Slade; P Dey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  A mixed-methods evaluation of the Educational Supervision Agreement for Wales.

Authors:  Katie Louise Webb; Alison Bullock; Caroline Groves; Anton Gerhard Saayman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.