PURPOSE: The bradycardia produced by neostigmine and edrophonium was examined according to its relation to cholinesterase inhibition and to its sensitivity to block by muscarinic receptor antagonists. For comparison, the ability of muscarinic antagonists to block the bradycardia produced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve was determined. METHODS: Cats were anaesthetized, vagotomized and propranolol-treated. Heart rate was continuously recorded. Erythrocyte cholinesterase activity of arterial blood was measured using a radiometric technique. The right vagus nerve was isolated for electrical stimulation. The muscarinic antagonists used were atropine, glycopyrrolate, pancuronium, gallamine, and AFDX-116. RESULTS: Neostigmine produced a dose-dependent decrease in cholinesterase activity which reached a plateau at a cumulative dose of 0.16 mg.kg-1 (ED50 0.009 +/- 0.003 mg.kg-1). Neostigmine produced a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate with the dose-response relationship (ED50 0.1 +/- 0.01 mg.kg-1; P = 0.0006) shifted to the right of that for the inhibition of cholinesterase activity. In contrast to the anticholinesterase effect, the bradycardic effect did not reach a plateau and continued to increase even at doses at which the cholinesterase inhibition was maximal. The maximal decrease in heart rate when the heart was still in sinus rhythm was by 81 +/- 13 bpm (49 +/- 7% of baseline), which was produced by a dose of 0.32 mg.kg-1. Edrophonium produced dose-dependent decreases in cholinesterase activity and heart rate, which were highly correlated (correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.0001). The ED50 of the reduction in heart rate (0.9 +/- 0.18 mg.kg-1) and cholinesterase activity (0.89 +/- 0.12 mg.kg-1) produced by edrophonium were similar. Moreover, the reduction in heart rate and cholinesterase activity produced by edrophonium reached a plateau at the same dose (6.4 mg.kg-1). At this dose, heart rate decreased by 22 +/- 2 bpm (14.6 +/- 0.9% of baseline). Compared to the bradycardia produced by stimulation of the vagus nerve, that produced by neostigmine was blocked by muscarinic antagonists at significantly lower doses while that produced by edrophonium was blocked at similar doses. CONCLUSIONS: The neostigmine-induced bradycardia is poorly correlated with cholinesterase inhibition compared to that produced by edrophonium, and has a higher sensitivity to muscarinic receptor antagonists compared to that produced by edrophonium or vagus nerve stimulation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the neostigmine-induced bradycardia is, in part, the result of neostigmine directly activating cholinergic receptors within the cardiac parasympathetic pathway. The bradycardia produced by edrophonium may be accounted for solely by an anticholinesterase action.
PURPOSE: The bradycardia produced by neostigmine and edrophonium was examined according to its relation to cholinesterase inhibition and to its sensitivity to block by muscarinic receptor antagonists. For comparison, the ability of muscarinic antagonists to block the bradycardia produced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve was determined. METHODS:Cats were anaesthetized, vagotomized and propranolol-treated. Heart rate was continuously recorded. Erythrocyte cholinesterase activity of arterial blood was measured using a radiometric technique. The right vagus nerve was isolated for electrical stimulation. The muscarinic antagonists used were atropine, glycopyrrolate, pancuronium, gallamine, and AFDX-116. RESULTS:Neostigmine produced a dose-dependent decrease in cholinesterase activity which reached a plateau at a cumulative dose of 0.16 mg.kg-1 (ED50 0.009 +/- 0.003 mg.kg-1). Neostigmine produced a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate with the dose-response relationship (ED50 0.1 +/- 0.01 mg.kg-1; P = 0.0006) shifted to the right of that for the inhibition of cholinesterase activity. In contrast to the anticholinesterase effect, the bradycardic effect did not reach a plateau and continued to increase even at doses at which the cholinesterase inhibition was maximal. The maximal decrease in heart rate when the heart was still in sinus rhythm was by 81 +/- 13 bpm (49 +/- 7% of baseline), which was produced by a dose of 0.32 mg.kg-1. Edrophonium produced dose-dependent decreases in cholinesterase activity and heart rate, which were highly correlated (correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.0001). The ED50 of the reduction in heart rate (0.9 +/- 0.18 mg.kg-1) and cholinesterase activity (0.89 +/- 0.12 mg.kg-1) produced by edrophonium were similar. Moreover, the reduction in heart rate and cholinesterase activity produced by edrophonium reached a plateau at the same dose (6.4 mg.kg-1). At this dose, heart rate decreased by 22 +/- 2 bpm (14.6 +/- 0.9% of baseline). Compared to the bradycardia produced by stimulation of the vagus nerve, that produced by neostigmine was blocked by muscarinic antagonists at significantly lower doses while that produced by edrophonium was blocked at similar doses. CONCLUSIONS: The neostigmine-induced bradycardia is poorly correlated with cholinesterase inhibition compared to that produced by edrophonium, and has a higher sensitivity to muscarinic receptor antagonists compared to that produced by edrophonium or vagus nerve stimulation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the neostigmine-induced bradycardia is, in part, the result of neostigmine directly activating cholinergic receptors within the cardiac parasympathetic pathway. The bradycardia produced by edrophonium may be accounted for solely by an anticholinesterase action.