Literature DB >> 8806226

Structure and biodistribution relationships of photodynamic sensitizers.

R W Boyle1, D Dolphin.   

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has, during the last quarter century, developed into a fully fledged biomedical field with its own association, the International Photodynamic Association (IPA) and regular conferences devoted solely to this topic. Recent approval of the first PDT sensitizer, Photofrin (porfimer sodium), by health boards in Canada, Japan, the Netherlands and United States for use against certain types of solid tumors represents, perhaps, the single most significant-indicator of the progress of PDT from a laboratory research concept to clinical reality. The approval of Photofrin will undoubtedly encourage the accelerated development of second-generation photosensitizers, which have recently been the subject of intense study. Many of these second-generation drugs show significant differences, when compared to Photofrin, in terms of treatment times postinjection, light doses and drug doses required for optimal results. These differences can ultimately be attributed to variations in either the quantum efficiency of the photosensitizer in situ, which is in turn affected by aggregation state, localized concentration of endogenous quenchers and primary photophysics of the dye, or the intratumoral and intracellular localization of the photosensitizer at the time of activation with light. The purpose of this review is to bring together data relating to the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of second-generation sensitizers and attempt to correlate this with structural and electronic features of these molecules. As this requires a clear knowledge of photosensitizer structure, only chemically well-characterized compounds are included, e.g. Photofrin and crude sulfonated phthalocyanines have been excluded as they are known to be complex mixtures. Nonporphyrin-based photosensitizers, e.g. rose bengal and the hypericins, have also been omitted to allow meaningful comparisons to be made between different compounds. As the intracellular distribution of photosensitizers to organelles and other subcellular structures can have a large effect on PDT efficacy, a section will be devoted to this topic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8806226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  51 in total

1.  Equilibrium and kinetic studies of the interactions of a porphyrin with low-density lipoproteins.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bonneau; Christine Vever-Bizet; Patrice Morlière; Jean-Claude Mazière; Daniel Brault
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Glycosylated Porphyrins, Phthalocyanines, and Other Porphyrinoids for Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Sunaina Singh; Amit Aggarwal; N V S Dinesh K Bhupathiraju; Gianluca Arianna; Kirran Tiwari; Charles Michael Drain
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation by a newly developed photosensitizer chrolophyll derivative CPD4.

Authors:  Zhu Qiao; Junye Wang; Huili Wang; Xiaowei Liu; Ruidong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Chitosan augments photodynamic inactivation of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Tsuimin Tsai; Hsiung-Fei Chien; Tze-Hsien Wang; Ching-Tsan Huang; Yaw-Bee Ker; Chin-Tin Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Imidazole metalloporphyrins as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: role of molecular charge, central metal and hydroxyl radical production.

Authors:  Pawel Mroz; Jayeeta Bhaumik; Dilek K Dogutan; Zarmeneh Aly; Zahra Kamal; Laiqua Khalid; Hooi Ling Kee; David F Bocian; Dewey Holten; Jonathan S Lindsey; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  Neuron and gliocyte death induced by photodynamic treatment: signal processes and neuron-glial interactions.

Authors:  A B Uzdenskii; M S Kolosov; A V Lobanov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-08-16

7.  Photodynamic killing of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules using mTHPC incorporated in liposomes and invasomes.

Authors:  Anna Ossmann; Stefan Kranz; Guellmar Andre; Andrea Völpel; Volker Albrecht; Alfred Fahr; Bernd W Sigusch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effect of molecular characteristics on cellular uptake, subcellular localization, and phototoxicity of Zn(II) N-alkylpyridylporphyrins.

Authors:  Rima Ezzeddine; Anwar Al-Banaw; Artak Tovmasyan; James D Craik; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Ludmil T Benov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Combined arene ruthenium porphyrins as chemotherapeutics and photosensitizers for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Frédéric Schmitt; Padavattan Govindaswamy; Olivier Zava; Georg Süss-Fink; Lucienne Juillerat-Jeanneret; Bruno Therrien
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Singlet oxygen generation enhanced by silver-pectin nanoparticles.

Authors:  Luciana S A de Melo; Anderson S L Gomes; Sybele Saska; Karina Nigoghossian; Younes Messaddeq; Sidney J L Ribeiro; Renato E de Araujo
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.