Literature DB >> 8806027

Possible confounding influence of strain, age and gender on cognitive performance in rats.

J S Andrews1.   

Abstract

There are substantial differences in the performance of various rat strains in tasks of learning, memory and attention. Strain, age and sex differences are not consistent over procedures: poor performance in one paradigm does not predict poor performance in a different paradigm. Some strain differences are not readily apparent until a direct comparison is made between one or more strains. Moreover, large differences in nominally the same strain but obtained from different suppliers have been observed in behavioural, pharmacological and physiological parameters and can have important consequences for interpretation of drug effects. Longevity, and the effects of ageing can differ dramatically from one strain to another; drug effects can alter radically with increasing age and show strain (and individual) differences in their action. Sex can further complicate interpretation of results. Thus, non-cognitive factors may exert a major effect on results in cognitive testing, and strain-dependent effects may account for many conflicting results in the literature concerning mnemonic performance. Strain differences in particular must be identified and used to help identify fundamental effects on memory, rather than continue to be ignored and allowed to obscure interpretation of drug effects on cognitive processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8806027     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(96)00011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  13 in total

1.  Effects of the cognition-enhancing agent ABT-239 on fetal ethanol-induced deficits in dentate gyrus synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Rafael K Varaschin; Katherine G Akers; Martina J Rosenberg; Derek A Hamilton; Daniel D Savage
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Memantine protects rats treated with intrathecal methotrexate from developing spatial memory deficits.

Authors:  Peter D Cole; Veena Vijayanathan; Nafeeza F Ali; Mark E Wagshul; Eric J Tanenbaum; Jeremy Price; Vidhi Dalal; Maria E Gulinello
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Chronic sleep restriction impairs spatial memory in rats.

Authors:  John G McCoy; Michael A Christie; Youngsoo Kim; Robert Brennan; Devon L Poeta; Robert W McCarley; Robert E Strecker
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Comparison of spatial learning in the partially baited radial-arm maze task between commonly used rat strains: Wistar, Spargue-Dawley, Long-Evans, and outcrossed Wistar/Sprague-Dawley.

Authors:  Çiğdem Gökçek-Saraç; Malgorzata Wesierska; Ewa Jakubowska-Doğru
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Memory loss in old rats is associated with brain mitochondrial decay and RNA/DNA oxidation: partial reversal by feeding acetyl-L-carnitine and/or R-alpha -lipoic acid.

Authors:  Jiankang Liu; Elizabeth Head; Afshin M Gharib; Wenjun Yuan; Russell T Ingersoll; Tory M Hagen; Carl W Cotman; Bruce N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Behavioral perturbations after prenatal neurogenesis disturbance in female rat.

Authors:  Franck Hazane; Marie-Odile Krebs; Thérèse M Jay; Gwenaëlle Le Pen
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Rat strain influences the use of egocentric learning strategies mediated by neostriatum.

Authors:  Pablo Espina-Marchant; Teresa Pinto-Hamuy; Diego Bustamante; Paola Morales; Mario Herrera-Marschitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  How stress alters memory in 'smart' snails.

Authors:  Sarah Dalesman; Ken Lukowiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Emotional reactivity and cognitive performance in aversively motivated tasks: a comparison between four rat strains.

Authors:  F Josef van der Staay; Teun Schuurman; Cornelis G van Reenen; S Mechiel Korte
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Interaction of genotype and environment: effect of strain and housing conditions on cognitive behavior in rodent models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Karly M Turner; Thomas H J Burne
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.