Literature DB >> 8806022

Effects of procedural parameters on response accuracy: lessons from delayed (non-)matching procedures in animals.

A van Hest1, T Steckler.   

Abstract

The experimental analysis of behaviour in operant paradigms has identified numerous variables which affect performance. We will focus on the delayed (non-)matching tasks in order to illustrate the influence of procedural variables on acquisition and performance in operant tasks of cognitive function. Systematic variation of these parameters can help dissociate different cognitive processes which may be differentially affected by drug treatment or brain lesions. Use of different parameters, however, could equally account for controversial drug or lesion effects reported in the literature. Consideration of these factors will increase our understanding of the relative contribution of these and other features and parameters of the procedural arrangements to the final behavioural outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8806022     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(96)00006-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  7 in total

1.  Testosterone impairs the acquisition of an operant delayed alternation task in male rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  D1- versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans.

Authors:  U Müller; D Y von Cramon; S Pollmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of multiple daily genistein treatments on delayed alternation and a differential reinforcement of low rates of responding task in middle-aged rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Suren B Bandara; Daniel R Doerge; William G Helferich; Donna L Korol; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Voluntary exercise impairs initial delayed spatial alternation performance in estradiol treated ovariectomized middle-aged rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Donna L Korol; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Auditory proactive interference in monkeys: the roles of stimulus set size and intertrial interval.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Working memory in bisphenol-A treated middle-aged ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Suren B Bandara; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  Learned Use of Picture Cues by Bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) in a Delayed Matching Task.

Authors:  Emma Thompson; Catherine Plowright
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.