Literature DB >> 8805336

Suppression of motion-produced smear during smooth pursuit eye movements.

H E Bedell1, L A Lott.   

Abstract

Humans make smooth tracking eye movements to keep the image of a moving target on the foveal region of the retina and, thereby, maintain acute vision. Although the images of physically stationary background stimuli sweep across the retina during smooth pursuit eye movements, non-pursued targets are usually perceived to be neither moving nor smeared. The lack of perceived movement of background stimuli is generally attributed to a 'cancellation' of the retinal image motion by extraretinal information about the eye movement [1,2]; this information comes primarily from a neural facsimile of the efferent command to move the eyes, augmented by afferent signals from receptors in the extraocular muscles [3,4]. Here, we show that a physically stationary target presented during smooth tracking is perceived to have considerably less smear than a target that moves comparably across the retina, but when the eye is stationary. This result implies that extraretinal signals for pursuit eye movements also contribute to the alleviation of perceived smear for non-tracked, background targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8805336     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00650-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  13 in total

1.  Attenuation of perceived motion smear during vergence and pursuit tracking.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The attenuation of perceived motion smear during combined eye and head movements.

Authors:  Jianliang Tong; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The temporal impulse response function in infantile nystagmus.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Mahalakshmi Ramamurthy; Saumil S Patel; Shobana Subramaniam; Lan-Phuong Vu-Yu; Jianliang Tong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Influence of motion smear on visual acuity in simulated infantile nystagmus.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Martin W LaFrance; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

7.  Smooth pursuit eye movements improve temporal resolution for color perception.

Authors:  Masahiko Terao; Junji Watanabe; Akihiro Yagi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The temporal impulse response function during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Jianliang Tong; Mahalakshmi Ramamurthy; Saumil S Patel; Lan-Phuong Vu-Yu; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Motion deblurring during pursuit tracking improves spatial-interval acuity.

Authors:  Michael J Moulder; Jin Qian; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The fate of visible features of invisible elements.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Thomas U Otto; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.