Literature DB >> 8800899

Penile fracture: differential diagnosis, management and outcome.

T Karadeniz1, M Topsakal, A Ariman, H Erton, D Basak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of a diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients presenting with acute penis and the effects of this management on the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprises 21 consecutive patients (mean age 33.3 years, range 19-53) who presented with acute penis (acute pain and swelling during and soon after intercourse). The mean interval between the accident and the treatment was 6 h (range 2-20). All patients initially underwent cavernosography, followed by surgical exploration.
RESULTS: Cavernosography showed extravasation of the contrast medium, indicating a corporal tear, in 19 of 21 patients. Surgical exploration revealed rupture of the deep dorsal vein in two patients whose radiological examinations were normal. In the remaining 19 patients, corporeal tears were repaired. The mean follow-up was 26.7 months; all patients regained penile function (potency). Penile curvature was the only adverse effect in three of the 21 patients, all of whom presented for medical treatment relatively late after the initial accident.
CONCLUSION: In the management of the acute penis, cavernosography should be performed first and the treatment policy should be determined from the radiological findings. Conservative therapy should be chosen only when the corporeal bodies are intact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8800899     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.86420.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  13 in total

1.  Fractured penis: a clinical misnomer!

Authors:  R G Casey; D Galvin; D Bouchier-Hayes; G Lennon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  [External genital injuries. Diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  C van der Horst; C M Naumann; F J Martinez-Portillo; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Management of penile fracture.

Authors:  S B Morris; M A Miller; K Anson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Can it wait? A systematic review of immediate vs. delayed surgical repair of penile fractures.

Authors:  Nathan Colin Wong; Shawn Dason; Rahul K Bansal; Timothy O Davies; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Imaging of penile traumas--therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Michele Bertolotto; Loretta Calderan; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Current treatment options for penile fractures.

Authors:  Gregory S Jack; Isla Garraway; Richard Reznichek; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

7.  Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Soumendranath Mandal; Prasenjit Bhowmik; Prashant Gupta; Bandhan Bahal; Pramod Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

8.  Superficial dorsal vein rupture imitating penile fracture.

Authors:  Caner Baran; Medih Topsakal; Ender Kavukcu; Tahir Karadeniz
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22

9.  Penile Fracture: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Rajkumar Singha Mahapatra; Anup Kumar Kundu; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.400

10.  A physical sign of coital rupture of superficial dorsal vein of penis.

Authors:  Sani Aminu; Farooq Usman; Alexandrou Kyriacos
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2011-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.