R E Goldstein1, M Andrews, W J Hall, A J Moss. 1. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4799, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the role of aspirin in a precisely defined cohort with coronary disease receiving current therapy. BACKGROUND: Prior results suggest that aspirin modestly decreases cardiac mortality in patients with coronary disease. However, these findings reflect heterogeneous study conditions and earlier management strategies. METHODS: We utilized findings from the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia, which enrolled 936 subjects 1 to 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (n = 651 [70%]) or unstable angina (n = 285 [30%]). The follow-up period averaged 23 months, with treatment determined by referring physicians. RESULTS: At enrollment, 751 patients (80%) took aspirin regularly, usually 250 to 325 mg/day. Before enrollment, 291 patients (31%) had thrombolysis, and 352 (38%) had coronary angioplasty. During follow-up, cardiac death occurred in 22 patients, all-cause mortality in 31 and cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in 70. Each of these outcomes was significantly less frequent among aspirin users. Cardiac death rate was markedly reduced: 1.6% for aspirin users and 5.4% for nonusers (p = 0.005). These differences were not explained by imbalances in predictors of postinfarction risk or therapy other than aspirin (Cox hazard ratio 0.37, p = 0.023). They persisted at least 2 years after enrollment. The difference in mortality rate was particularly prominent after thrombolysis: 0.9% for aspirin users and 8.8% for nonusers (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in cardiac deaths among aspirin users is substantially greater than that reported previously. Although derived secondarily, our findings suggest that current practice leads to situations in which aspirin exerts a long-term, life-protecting action, particularly after thrombolysis.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the role of aspirin in a precisely defined cohort with coronary disease receiving current therapy. BACKGROUND: Prior results suggest that aspirin modestly decreases cardiac mortality in patients with coronary disease. However, these findings reflect heterogeneous study conditions and earlier management strategies. METHODS: We utilized findings from the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia, which enrolled 936 subjects 1 to 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (n = 651 [70%]) or unstable angina (n = 285 [30%]). The follow-up period averaged 23 months, with treatment determined by referring physicians. RESULTS: At enrollment, 751 patients (80%) took aspirin regularly, usually 250 to 325 mg/day. Before enrollment, 291 patients (31%) had thrombolysis, and 352 (38%) had coronary angioplasty. During follow-up, cardiac death occurred in 22 patients, all-cause mortality in 31 and cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in 70. Each of these outcomes was significantly less frequent among aspirin users. Cardiac death rate was markedly reduced: 1.6% for aspirin users and 5.4% for nonusers (p = 0.005). These differences were not explained by imbalances in predictors of postinfarction risk or therapy other than aspirin (Cox hazard ratio 0.37, p = 0.023). They persisted at least 2 years after enrollment. The difference in mortality rate was particularly prominent after thrombolysis: 0.9% for aspirin users and 8.8% for nonusers (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in cardiac deaths among aspirin users is substantially greater than that reported previously. Although derived secondarily, our findings suggest that current practice leads to situations in which aspirin exerts a long-term, life-protecting action, particularly after thrombolysis.