Literature DB >> 8799541

A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.

L Henriksen1, K Schmidt, V Eskesen, E Jantzen.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether a microsurgical discectomy (MS), compared with a standard lumbar discectomy (SD), could reduce the stay at the hospital or the postoperative morbidity. The study was prospective and of 79 patients with "virgin' lumbar radiculopathy from only one nerve root, 39 were randomized to MS and 40 to SD. All patients had positive myelography or CT findings. The fascia incision was 31 and 70 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, but the skin incision was of the same length in both groups to blind the study. For the MS and SD group of patients, the median operation time was 48 and 35 min (p < 0.0001), and the stay at the hospital was 5.2 and 4.6 days, respectively. The two groups were not different in sex, age, localization or type of herniated discs. Use of analgesic medicine and the presence of pain in the back or legs pre- and postoperative was the same. We conclude that in a controlled and prospective study, reducing the fascia incision and the muscular dissection from a median of 70-31 mm, does not shorten the length of a stay at a hospital and it has no influence on postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799541     DOI: 10.1080/02688699650040160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  26 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 4.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-26

Review 5.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-28

6.  The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Xian Chang; Bin Chen; Hai-yin Li; Xiao-bo Han; Yue Zhou; Chang-qing Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Sciatica: what the rheumatologist needs to know.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Wilco Peul; Bart Koes
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

8.  Structural and Chemical Modification to Improve Adhesive and Material Properties of Fibrin-Genipin for Repair of Annulus Fibrosus Defects in Intervertebral Disks.

Authors:  Michelle A Cruz; Steven McAnany; Nikita Gupta; Rose G Long; Philip Nasser; David Eglin; Andrew C Hecht; Svenja Illien-Junger; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Alberto Gotfryd; Osmar Avanzi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.