Literature DB >> 8799538

Value of visual evoked potential monitoring during trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery.

A G Chacko1, K S Babu, M J Chandy.   

Abstract

The visual outcome of 22 patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal excision of pituitary macroadenomas with intraoperative flash visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring (Group A), was compared with a non-randomized group of 14 patients who had undergone similar operations without VEP monitoring (Group B). Tumour size, preoperative visual acuity, peripheral fields, and latencies and amplitudes of P1 and P2 were analysed to ascertain the best predictor of postoperative visual function. It was found that patients in Group A had a significantly greater improvement in field defects than those in Group B. There was no difference in postoperative improvement in visual acuity between the two groups. None of the variables analysed were good predictors of visual outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799538     DOI: 10.1080/02688699650040133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  10 in total

1.  Fourier transformed steady-state flash evoked potentials for continuous monitoring of visual pathway function.

Authors:  R Bergholz; T N Lehmann; G Fritz; K Rüther
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during an optic nerve schwannoma removal.

Authors:  Daniel San-Juan; Manuel Escanio Cortés; Martha Tena-Suck; Adolfo Josué Orozco Garduño; Jesús Alejandro López Pizano; Jonathan Villanueva Domínguez; Maricarmen Fernández Gónzalez-Aragón; Juan Luis Gómez-Amador
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Surgery around the Orbit: How to Select an Approach.

Authors:  Davide Locatelli; Iacopo Dallan; Paolo Castelnuovo
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-09-21

4.  Cortical potentials after electrical intraneural stimulation of the optic nerve during orbital enucleation.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Matej Beltram; Brigita Drnovšek Olup; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  White matter changes linked to visual recovery after nerve decompression.

Authors:  David A Paul; Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Eric B Hintz; Giscard J Adeclat; Tong Zhu; Zoë R Williams; G Edward Vates; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Predictive factors for vision recovery after optic nerve decompression for chronic compressive neuropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew P Carlson; Martina Stippler; Orrin Myers
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-11-26

7.  Clinical utility and limitations of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yeda Luo; Luca Regli; Oliver Bozinov; Johannes Sarnthein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials in transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Kamio; Naoto Sakai; Tetsuro Sameshima; Goro Takahashi; Shinichiro Koizumi; Kenji Sugiyama; Hiroki Namba
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base: A Technical Guide.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Richard W Vogel; Robert M Lober; Adam T Doan; Craig I Matsumoto; Tyler J Kenning; James J Evans
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-05-16

10.  Deep Learning for Automatically Visual Evoked Potential Classification During Surgical Decompression of Sellar Region Tumors.

Authors:  Nidan Qiao; Mengju Song; Zhao Ye; Wenqiang He; Zengyi Ma; Yongfei Wang; Yuyan Zhang; Xuefei Shou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.