Literature DB >> 8799517

Stereoselective interaction between piroxicam and acenocoumarol.

P Bonnabry1, J Desmeules, S Rudaz, T Leemann, J L Veuthey, P Dayer.   

Abstract

1. An open-label study was performed to assess the effect of piroxicam on the pharmacokinetics of acenocoumarol enantiomers. 2. Eight healthy male volunteers received an oral dose of 4 mg rac-acenocoumarol on days 1 and 8, plus 40 mg piroxicam orally 2 h before the anticoagulant on day 8. R- and S-acenocoumarol, piroxicam and their metabolites were measured in plasma over a 24 h interval. 3. The pharmacokinetics of R-acenocoumarol were markedly modified by piroxicam: Cmax+28.0% (s.d.23.8), P < 0.05; AUC(0, 24 h)+47.2% (21.5), P < 0.005; and t1/2 +38.0% (34.5), P < 0.01. A concomitant decrease of CL/F was observed: -30.8% (10.0), P < 0.0001. A similar, but statistically non-significant trend, was observed on the S-enantiomer: Cmax: +9.5% (s.d.36.6), AUC(0, 24 h): + 15.4% (23.4), t1/2: +19.9% (42.0), and CL/F: -9.8% (20.5). V/F remained unchanged for both enantiomers. 4. Piroxicam plasma AUC(0, 24 h) correlated closely with R- and S-acenocoumarol AUCs on day 1 (r = 0.901, P < 0.005 and r = 0.797, P < 0.05, respectively), as well as with the difference of AUC between days 1 and 8 for R-acenocoumarol (r = 0.903, P < 0.001) and S-acenocoumarol (r = 0.711, P < 0.05). 5. Piroxicam markedly reduced acenocoumarol enantiomer clearance, with a greater effect on the more active R-isomer. This interaction, which occurs in addition to the well documented pharmacodynamic one (effect on platelets), is expected to result in increased anticoagulant effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799517      PMCID: PMC2042630          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  2 in total

1.  A placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction study between tamsulosin and acenocoumarol.

Authors:  P Rolan; I J Terpstra; C Clarke; F Mullins; J N Visser
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Which concentration of the inhibitor should be used to predict in vivo drug interactions from in vitro data?

Authors:  Kiyomi Ito; Koji Chiba; Masato Horikawa; Michi Ishigami; Naomi Mizuno; Jun Aoki; Yasumasa Gotoh; Takafumi Iwatsubo; Shin-ichi Kanamitsu; Motohiro Kato; Iichiro Kawahara; Kayoko Niinuma; Akiko Nishino; Norihito Sato; Yuko Tsukamoto; Kaoru Ueda; Tomoo Itoh; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.