Literature DB >> 8799424

Prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease with RO-11 (ROVI), during abdominal surgery. EMRO1 (Grupo Fstudio Multicintrico RO-11).

E Moreno Gonzalez1, J Fontcuberta, F de la Llama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We carried out a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, controlled and randomized trial, in two groups of patients (n = 100 each) with a low/moderate risk of Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), who underwent elective abdominal surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RO-11 at a daily s.c. dose of 2,500 anti-FXa IU, compared with s.c. 5,000 IU of calcium unfractionated heparin (UH).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The endpoints for efficacy were the reduction of the frequency of DVT and Pulmonary embolism (PE). Safety was assessed by means of major and minor bleeding complications, allergy and thrombocytopenia < or = 50,000/mm3. RO-11 is a low molecular mass heparin (LMMH) (3,600 Da). RO-11 at a s.c. dose of 2,500 anti F-Xa IU combined with placebo experimental group (EG), was compared to 5,000 anti F-Xa IU of s.c. UH 12 hourly control group (CG), for 7 days.
RESULTS: There were no cases of DVT, PE or death in any group. The requirement of transfusion, re-operation because of bleeding, and the frequency of wound hematoma were higher in the CG. The size of the wound hematoma was similar but tended to be larger in the CG. The number and size of hematoma at the injection site were higher in the CG. The mean anti F-Xa levels in the EG were similar throughout the treatment. One patient (EG) showed a moderate thrombocytopenia without thrombosis or bleeding.
CONCLUSION: RO-11 at a single s.c. dose of 2,500 anti F-Xa IU is as efficient as, and safer than, UH in the prevention of thrombosis or related to abdominal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  6 in total

1.  Bemiparin versus unfractionated heparin as bridging therapy in the perioperative management of patients on vitamin K antagonists: the BERTA study.

Authors:  Amparo Santamaría; Arantxa Ugarriza; Carmen Muñoz; Isabel De Diego; Francisca López-Chulia; Carmen Benet; Javier Martínez-González; Natividad Gómez; Elena Pina; Xavier Ortín; Pascual Marco; Franciso Javier Roncalés; Jordi Fontcuberta
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Clinical experience with bemiparin.

Authors:  José Ignacio Abad Rico; Francisco S Lozano Sánchez; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Bemiparin: pharmacological profile.

Authors:  Carlos F Sánchez-Ferrer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Utilisation and safety of bemiparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in medical patients : a prospective, uncontrolled cohort study.

Authors:  Francisco Miras-Parra; Emilia Navascués-Martínez; Antonio Gómez-Outes; Javier Martínez-González; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.

Authors:  David R Anderson; Gian Paolo Morgano; Carole Bennett; Francesco Dentali; Charles W Francis; David A Garcia; Susan R Kahn; Maryam Rahman; Anita Rajasekhar; Frederick B Rogers; Maureen A Smythe; Kari A O Tikkinen; Adolph J Yates; Tejan Baldeh; Sara Balduzzi; Jan L Brożek; Itziar Etxeandia- Ikobaltzeta; Herman Johal; Ignacio Neumann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Holger J Schünemann; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 6.  Bemiparin: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.