Literature DB >> 8799240

Prognostic value of tomographic rest-redistribution thallium 201 imaging in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

G Gioia1, E Milan, R Giubbini, N DePace, J Heo, A S Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show that rest-redistribution thallium imaging is useful in the assessment of myocardial viability. The impact of such studies on patient outcome is not well defined. This study examined the prognostic value of tomographic rest-redistribution 201T1 imaging in 81 medically treated patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Rest-redistribution single-photon emission computed tomographic images were obtained and analyzed quantitatively. The segmental thallium uptake (20 segments per patient) was interpreted as normal, reversible defect, mild to moderate fixed defect, or severe fixed defect. The thallium images were abnormal in 80 patients, with no redistribution (no ischemia) in 43 patients and redistribution (ischemia) in 38 patients. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 27% +/- 8% in patients with no redistribution and 26% +/- 7% in patients with redistribution (difference not significant). In patients with no ischemia, there were 7 +/- 5 severe fixed defects and 5 +/- 4 mild to moderate fixed defects per patient. In patients with ischemia there were 7 +/- 4 reversible defects, 3 +/- 3 mild to moderate fixed defects, and 5 +/- 4 severe fixed defects per patient. The number of any abnormal segments was 11 +/- 5 in patients with no ischemia and 14 +/- 4 in patients with ischemia (p = 0.03). During a mean follow-up of 31 +/- 24 months, there were 11 cardiac deaths in patients with no ischemia (26%) and 22 in patients with ischemia (58%); the survival rate was worse in patients with than without ischemia (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox survival analysis on important clinical, angiographic, and thallium variables showed that the presence of redistribution was an independent predictor of death (x2 = 5; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction and redistribution on rest thallium imaging, a marker of hibernating myocardium, have a higher mortality rate with medical therapy than do patients with a comparable degree of left ventricular dysfunction but with fixed defects only. Thus observations similar to those made with positron emission tomography can be made in a much more straightforward, simple, and probably cost-effective manner with single-photon emission computed tomography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799240     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(96)90007-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  29 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnostic techniques of assessing myocardial viability in patients with hibernating and stunned myocardium.

Authors:  V Dilsizian; R O Bonow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  What is the true periprocedure myocardial infarction rate? Does anyone know for sure? The need for clarification.

Authors:  B R Chaitman; A S Jaffe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Insights into coronary artery disease gained from metabolic imaging.

Authors:  H R Schelbert; D Buxton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; S C Chae; J Heo; C D Stanberry; V Wasserleben; V Cave
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  When is myocardial viability an important clinical issue?

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; J Heo; C Stanberry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group.

Authors:  S G Thompson; J Kienast; S D Pyke; F Haverkate; J C van de Loo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clinical outcome of patients with advanced coronary artery disease after viability studies with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D Eitzman; Z al-Aouar; H L Kanter; J vom Dahl; M Kirsh; G M Deeb; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Enhanced detection of ischemic but viable myocardium by the reinjection of thallium after stress-redistribution imaging.

Authors:  V Dilsizian; T P Rocco; N M Freedman; M B Leon; R O Bonow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Rest and redistribution thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy to predict improvement in left ventricular function after coronary arterial bypass grafting.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; A H Hakki; S A Kane; I P Goel; E D Mundth; A H Hakki; B L Segal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  14 in total

1.  Use of myocardial perfusion imaging to assess viability.

Authors:  M I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Assessment of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Assessment of prognosis in chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T M Bateman; E Prvulovich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Hibernating myocardium: high or low risk?

Authors:  J H McGowan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging for assessment of myocardial viability: nuclear, echocardiography, MR, and CT.

Authors:  James A Arrighi; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Dynamic single photon emission computed tomography--basic principles and cardiac applications.

Authors:  Grant T Gullberg; Bryan W Reutter; Arkadiusz Sitek; Jonathan S Maltz; Thomas F Budinger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  John M Canty; James A Fallavollita
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in the risk stratification of patients with remote myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Combined assessment of left ventricular function and rest-redistribution regional myocardial thallium-201 activity for prognostic evaluation of patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  M Petretta; A Cuocolo; E Nicolai; W Acampa; M Salvatore; D Bonaduce
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Noninvasive assessment myocardial viability: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin C Allman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.