Literature DB >> 8798175

TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.

J R Gentry1, L A DeWerd.   

Abstract

An analysis is presented of the exposures received by TLDs placed on the breasts of 4400 women obtaining mammograms at 170 institutions across the United States. Mean glandular dose and exposure were examined as a function of compressed breast thickness. The exposure and mean glandular dose were found to increase linearly with breast thickness. The mean glandular dose typically delivered by the institutions was well below the limit of 3.0 mGy for the 4.5-cm breast. However, some institutions tend to uniformly give higher doses. In such institutions approximately 25% of 4.5-cm-thick breasts received a mean glandular dose exceeding 3.0 mGy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798175     DOI: 10.1118/1.597824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.

Authors:  Ji Eun Baek; Bong Joo Kang; Sung Hun Kim; Hyun Sil Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.