Literature DB >> 8797944

Enhancement of the normal pancreas: comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate.

U Kettritz1, D M Warshauer, E D Brown, J F Schlund, L B Eisenberg, R C Semelka.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to compare manganese-DPDP (Mn-DPDP) and gadolinium chelate (Gd-DTPA) contrast agents for enhancement of the normal pancreas. A total of 14 patients with focal liver disease underwent Mn-DPDP- and Gd-DTPA-enhanced 1.5 T MR examinations using spoiled gradient-echo (FLASH) technique at two separate times. Contrast agents were injected according to the currently recommended practices; Gd-DTPA was injected as a rapid bolus injection in a dosage of 0.1 mmol/kg, and Mn-DPDP was injected as a slow IV injection in a dosage of 5 mumol/kg. Quantitative region of interest measurements were made in 11 patients, and percent contrast enhancement of the pancreas and pancreas-fat signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were determined for each agent. Images were also evaluated qualitatively by consensus reading of two investigators and overall scan quality was rated on a scale from 1 (poor) to 4 (very good). Enhancement of the pancreas immediately post Gd-DTPA was significantly higher than 15 min post Mn-DPDP (73.3 vs 36.3%; p = 0.003). On postcontrast images the pancreas-fat SNR measurements were 7.7 (i.e., pancreas higher in signal than fat) and -6.1 for Gd-DTPA and Mn-DPDP, respectively, which was significantly different (p < 0.001). Image quality was rated as 3.1 and 2.5 for Gd-DTPA- and Mn-DPDP-enhanced images, respectively. The normal pancreas enhances significantly more with Gd-DTPA than with Mn-DPDP administered under the conditions of this study. Overall image quality is also greater on the Gd-DTPA-enhanced images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8797944     DOI: 10.1007/bf00619945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  Pancreatic disease: findings on state-of-the-art MR images.

Authors:  D G Mitchell; M Shapiro; A Schuricht; D Barbot; F Rosato
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Dynamic MR imaging of the abdomen with gadopentetate dimeglumine: normal enhancement patterns of the liver, spleen, stomach, and pancreas.

Authors:  M M Hamed; B Hamm; M E Ibrahim; M Taupitz; A E Mahfouz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Normal abdominal enhancement patterns with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; E Gutierrez; J K Lee; J J Brown; J P Heiken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  MR imaging of the pancreas at high field strength: comparison of six sequences.

Authors:  R C Semelka; F C Simm; M P Recht; M Deimling; G Lenz; G A Laub
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas with gadolinium-DTPA.

Authors:  J L Chezmar; R C Nelson; W C Small; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

6.  Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  H B Gehl; R Urhahn; K Bohndorf; P Klever; S Hauptmann; K P Lodemann; S Matern; V Schumpelick; R W Günther
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  [Manganese DPDP as a contrast medium for MR tomography of focal liver lesions. Tolerance and image quality in 20 patients].

Authors:  A F Kopp; M Laniado; K P Aicher; E F Grönewäller; C D Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1992-12

8.  Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5-T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.

Authors:  R C Semelka; M A Kroeker; J P Shoenut; R Kroeker; C S Yaffe; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Pancreatic enhancement after low-dose infusion of Mn-DPDP.

Authors:  H B Gehl; D Vorwerk; K C Klose; R W Günther
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  MR imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  D Tscholakoff; H Hricak; R Thoeni; M L Winkler; A R Margulis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Claus Kölblinger; Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini; Andreas Puespoek; Peter Götzinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Piero Boraschi; Francescamaria Donati; Roberto Gigoni; Davide Caramella; Ugo Boggi; Fabio Falaschi; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.