Literature DB >> 8797772

Agreement between breast cancer risk estimation methods.

K A McGuigan1, P A Ganz, C Breant.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8797772     DOI： 10.1093/jnci/88.18.1315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN： 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program.

Authors:  P L Chart; E Franssen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: a guide for clinicians.

Authors:  E B Claus
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Referral for cancer genetics consultation: a review and compilation of risk assessment criteria.

Authors:  H Hampel; K Sweet; J A Westman; K Offit; C Eng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Breast cancer risk-assessment models.

Authors:  D Gareth R Evans; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Association between CASC16 rs4784227 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiong-Shun Liang; Jun-Luan Mo; Li-Ming Hu; Chun-Mei Gong; Tao Liu; Wen-Xu Hong; Ji-Ye Yin; Zhao-Qian Liu; Hong-Hao Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.