STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) at work and effects on reported work performance among men in the general population and male patients suffering from snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of Swedish men between the ages of 30 and 64 years in the county of Kopparberg, in mid-Sweden. A random sample of the general population (n = 285) and consecutive patients referred to a sleep laboratory who fulfilled objective diagnostic criteria (snorers = 289, OSAS = 62) responded to a questionnaire. Responders from the general population were divided into 2 groups, nonsnorers (n = 223) and snorers (n = 62). To validate a question on snoring in the questionnaire, 50 men, randomly selected from the sample of the general population, underwent sleep apnea screening in their homes. RESULTS: The specificity of the questions about snoring was 83% and the sensitivity was 42%. The risk ratios for reporting EDS at work were 4-fold for snorers in the general population, 20-fold for snoring patients, and 40-fold for patients with OSAS as compared with nonsnoring men in the general population. Patients with OSAS and snoring patients both showed increased ratios on measures of difficulties with concentration, learning new tasks, and performing monotonous tasks when compared with nonsnorers. CONCLUSION: Snoring and sleep apnea were highly associated with excessive EDS at work and subjective work performance problems. The results provide additional evidence that snoring is not merely a nuisance.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) at work and effects on reported work performance among men in the general population and male patients suffering from snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study of Swedish men between the ages of 30 and 64 years in the county of Kopparberg, in mid-Sweden. A random sample of the general population (n = 285) and consecutive patients referred to a sleep laboratory who fulfilled objective diagnostic criteria (snorers = 289, OSAS = 62) responded to a questionnaire. Responders from the general population were divided into 2 groups, nonsnorers (n = 223) and snorers (n = 62). To validate a question on snoring in the questionnaire, 50 men, randomly selected from the sample of the general population, underwent sleep apnea screening in their homes. RESULTS: The specificity of the questions about snoring was 83% and the sensitivity was 42%. The risk ratios for reporting EDS at work were 4-fold for snorers in the general population, 20-fold for snoring patients, and 40-fold for patients with OSAS as compared with nonsnoring men in the general population. Patients with OSAS and snoring patients both showed increased ratios on measures of difficulties with concentration, learning new tasks, and performing monotonous tasks when compared with nonsnorers. CONCLUSION: Snoring and sleep apnea were highly associated with excessive EDS at work and subjective work performance problems. The results provide additional evidence that snoring is not merely a nuisance.
Authors: M Fransen; B Wilsmore; J Winstanley; M Woodward; R Grunstein; S Ameratunga; R Norton Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: C Diamanti; E Manali; M Ginieri-Coccossis; K Vougas; K Cholidou; E Markozannes; P Bakakos; I Liappas; M Alchanatis Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Terri E Weaver; Cristina Mancini; Greg Maislin; Jacqueline Cater; Bethany Staley; J Richard Landis; Kathleen A Ferguson; Charles F P George; David A Schulman; Harly Greenberg; David M Rapoport; Joyce A Walsleben; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Indira Gurubhagavatula; Samuel T Kuna Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 21.405