Literature DB >> 8795890

A critique of the double-blind clinical trial. Part 2.

H Kiene1.   

Abstract

The randomized, double-blind study is generally regarded as the gold standard of clinical drug trials. Bias can occur as a result of the blinding procedure itself, but discussions of this type of bias have been few and far between. This article continues with a detailed discussion of such blinding errors, which can obscure genuine drug effects and be of a sufficient magnitude as to generate false-negative results. Uncritical blinding in clinical studies should therefore be questioned.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8795890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med        ISSN: 1078-6791            Impact factor:   1.305


  1 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series.

Authors:  M A Taylor; D Reilly; R H Llewellyn-Jones; C McSharry; T C Aitchison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000 Aug 19-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.