Literature DB >> 8795768

A simple clinical method to measure the optic disc size in glaucoma.

C S Lim1, C O'Brien, N M Bolton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cup-to-disc ratio is a widely used clinical measure of optic nerve damage in the management of glaucoma patients and those suspected of having glaucoma. Knowledge of the optic disc size allows for a better assessment of the clinical significance of the cup-to-disc ratio. In this study, two optical methods-slit-lamp biomicroscopy and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy-were used to measure the vertical disc diameter as an indirect measure of optic disc size. The aim was to provide a simple and clinically useful examination technique in the management of glaucoma.
METHODS: The vertical optic disc diameter was measured with aspheric lenses (Volk 60, 78, and 90 D, and Nikon 60 and 90 D) using slit-lamp biomicroscopy in 25 emmetropic normal volunteers. The average of three readings was determined for each of the lenses and the measurements were correlated with the magnification-corrected diameter measured with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
RESULTS: The mean vertical disc diameter of the group, as measured with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, was 1.81 +/- 0.18 mm. Results obtained with the lower-power lenses correlated best with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph measurements (for example, Volk 60 D: r = 0.80, p = 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 1.76-1.85 mm), whereas the 90-D correlation was the weakest (for example, Volk 90 D: r = 0.59. p = 0.002, 95% confidence interval 1.75-1.87 mm). With the Volk 60-D lens, the "best fit" equation for estimating disc diameter, in millimetres, is Y = 0.85X + 0.06, where Y is the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph value and X is the slit-lamp biomicroscopy measurement.
CONCLUSION: Using these formulae, the clinician is able to estimate the optic disc diameter with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical decisions to be made in the evaluation of patients with glaucoma, without recourse to expensive technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8795768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Pharmacological mydriasis and optic disc examination.

Authors:  J F Kirwan; P Gouws; A E Linnell; J Crowston; C Bunce
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Disc damage likelihood scale.

Authors:  J D Henderer
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Magnification-corrected indirect biomicroscopy of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei; Michael Stur
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.

Authors:  George L Spaeth; Jeffrey Henderer; Connie Liu; Muge Kesen; Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; L Jay Katz; Jonathan Myers; Douglas Rhee; William Steinmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2002

5.  Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; S T Ruben; A Viswanathan; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Optic disk size and glaucoma.

Authors:  Esther M Hoffmann; Linda M Zangwill; Jonathan G Crowston; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.197

7.  An innovative and simple method, clinically comparable to high-definition optical coherence tomography in quantifying posterior segment lesions in the retina.

Authors:  Shaji P Koshy; Leena Mariyam Varghese; Satish Thomas; Pramod Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Clinical measurement and categorization of optic disc in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Harsha B Laxmana Rao; G C Sekhar; Ganesh J Babu; Rajul S Parikh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Andrea C Kara-José; Luiz Alberto S Melo; Bruno L B Esporcatte; Angelica T N H Endo; Mauro Toledo Leite; Ivan Maynart Tavares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.