Literature DB >> 8792692

Sensitization of esophageal mucosa by prior acid infusion: effect of decreasing intervals between infusions.

M A Siddiqui1, B T Johnston, L P Leite, D A Katzka, D O Castell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of decreasing time intervals between acid exposures on the sensitivity of the esophageal mucosa.
METHODS: Ten healthy subjects with no history of gastroesophageal reflux disease who were symptomatic during a modified Bernstein acid infusion test were recruited for the study. Hydrochloric acid solutions of pH 3, 2, and 1 were sequentially tested. The weakest pH solution that was perceived by the patient was used for the study. The same duration of acid infusions (9 ml/min for 5 min) were made but with decreasing time intervals between each subsequent acid infusion (30-0 min). Esophageal sensation during each of the infusions, the amount of distilled water required to raise intraesophageal pH > 4, and the duration of residual heartburn after pH > 4 were recorded.
RESULTS: Seven of the 10 subjects (70%) were Bernstein-positive to pH 3, two to pH 2, and only one to pH 1 solution. The median time to initial heartburn was significantly reduced only between the initial infusion and the first subsequent acid exposure 30 min later (165 vs 51.5 s, p < 0.009). Subsequent reductions in the time interval between infusions did not significantly reduce the perception threshold. The water required to clear the esophagus to pH > 4 and time required for the residual esophageal sensation to disappear were not significantly altered throughout the study.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that some episodes of reflux may be felt sooner and perhaps more severely despite similar levels of acid burden in the esophagus when sensitization by a prior reflux episode occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8792692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  6 in total

1.  Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; W L Curvers; R Timmer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Long-term experience of treating 185 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by anti-reflux surgery respecting the functional-morphological restoration of the esophagus.

Authors:  R Horstmann; C Classen; S Röttgermann; M Langer; D Palmes
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  The heart and the oesophagus: intimate relations.

Authors:  M Heatley; K Rose; C Weston
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  In vitro fertilization-induced pregnancies predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Ilker Turan; Gul Kitapcioglu; Ege Tavmergen Goker; Gulnaz Sahin; Serhat Bor
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Brain activity following esophageal acid infusion using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Abe; Manabu Tashiro; Tomoyuki Koike; Katsunori Iijima; Akira Imatani; Shuichi Ohara; Satoshi Watanabe; Shin Fukudo; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Charumathi Raghu Subramanian; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.