Literature DB >> 879136

Detection of gallbladder disease in patients with normal oral cholecystograms. Results using a simplified biliary drainage technique.

D C Foss, R R Laing.   

Abstract

An endoscopic biliary drainage technique was used in the study of 70 patients. All had histories suggestive of gallbladder disease but with normal oral cholecystograms. Of the 29 patients with abnormal drainage studies, 26 had cholecystectomy with all specimens showing cholecystitis, and cholelithiasis was seen in 46%. Five of the 41 patients with normal drainages underwent cholecystectomy, with no abnormality noted in any surgical specimen. Significant differences were seen when the mean WBC count, frequency of leukocytosis, and back pain were compared between the normal and abnormal drainage groups. Biliary drainage is a useful supplemental test when a false-negative oral cholecystogram is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 879136     DOI: 10.1007/bf01078347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dig Dis        ISSN: 0002-9211


  15 in total

Review 1.  THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RADIOLOGIC STUDIES OF THE BILIARY TRACT, SMALL INTESTINE AND COLON.

Authors:  R N COOLEY
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Biliary tract studies. II. The significance of biliary crystals.

Authors:  K JUNIPER; E N BURSON
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Use of duodenal drainage in diagnosis of cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Stueber; S J DeMarco
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Duodenal intubation versus cholecystography in the diagnosis of dyspepsia of the gall bladder type.

Authors:  A A Ibrahim; A el-Garem; A Zein-el-Abdin; N Abdel-Meguid
Journal:  J Egypt Med Assoc       Date:  1972

5.  Biliary drainage and cholecystography.

Authors:  H J Tumen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Falsely negative cholecystography and cholangiography.

Authors:  M Kolodny; J L Colker; E W Callahan; W G Baker
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1968-07

7.  Performance and reliability of cholecystography.

Authors:  S F Ochsner
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Limitations of the oral cholecystogram.

Authors:  H F Conquest; H S Spencer
Journal:  Va Med Mon (1918)       Date:  1965-11

9.  Cholecystokinin cholangiography and analysis of duodenal bile in the investigation of pain in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen without gallstones.

Authors:  J B Freeman; W N Cohen; L DenBesten
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-03

10.  Landmark article Feb 23, 1924: Roentgenologic examination of the gallbladder. Preliminary report of a new method utilizing the intravenous injection of tetrabromphenolphthalein. By Evarts A. Graham and Warren H. Cole.

Authors:  E A Graham; W H Cole
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Adequacy of endoscopic biopsy specimens for disaccharidase assays.

Authors:  J H Lee; W J Griffiths; I Zantout; J D Welsh
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1978-12

2.  Results of combined biliary drainage and cholecystokinin cholecystography in 81 patients with normal oral cholecystograms.

Authors:  M J Burnstein; K P Vassal; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Gallbladder dyskinesia in chronic acalculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  W R Brugge; D L Brand; H L Atkins; B P Lane; W G Abel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.