Literature DB >> 8790986

An inverted U-shaped curve for heptylphysostigmine on radial maze performance in rats: comparison with other cholinesterase inhibitors.

D Braida1, E Paladini, P Griffini, M Lamperti, A Maggi, M Sala.   

Abstract

The potential of heptylphysostigmine tartrate (pyrrolo [2,3b] indol-5-ol, 3,3a,8,8a-hexahydro-1,3a,8-trimethylheptylcarbamate [ester, (3aS-cis)]) (MF201), a new second-generation cholinesterase inhibitor, to antagonize scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats was assessed in an 8-arm radial maze. Upon completing the training session, the rats were orally administered increasing doses of MF201 (2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 mg/kg) 60 min prior to a s.c. injection of scopolamine (0.25 mg/kg). 9-Amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroamino-acridine hydrochloride hydrate (tacrine) (0.25, 0.37, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg), 1-benzil-4-[(5,6-dimethoxy-1-indanon)-2-yl]-methyl piperidine (E2020) (0.125, 0.18, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) and physostigmine (0.15, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) were orally administered and rats were tested in the same task. As previously described, scopolamine induced an impairment in radial maze performance, measured in terms of total number of errors, total time taken to complete the task and the percentage of amnesic animals. The reversal of scopolamine-induced impairment was characterized by the presence of an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. A significant antagonistic effect was achieved with a dose (mg/kg) of 0.25 for E2020, 0.5 for tacrine and physostigmine and 3, 4 and 6 for MF201, the latter manifesting a broader spectrum of activity (3-6 mg/kg). While the maximal active doses restored the scopolamine-induced modified pattern of arm entry, they were ineffective in reducing hypermotility, suggesting the drugs have a specific effect on cognitive function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8790986     DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00072-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  27 in total

1.  The inverted "u-shaped" dose-effect relationships in learning and memory: modulation of arousal and consolidation.

Authors:  Elisabetta Baldi; Corrado Bucherelli
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2005-01

2.  Quantitative characterization of animal behavior following blast exposure.

Authors:  Paul Ernest Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  Donepezil: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Dooley; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Donepezil.

Authors:  H M Bryson; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Pharmacodynamic-tolerability relationships of cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  B P Imbimbo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Symptomatic effect of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine on cognitive deficits in the APP23 model.

Authors:  Debby Van Dam; Dorothee Abramowski; Matthias Staufenbiel; Peter Paul De Deyn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Anti-dementia drugs and hippocampal-dependent memory in rodents.

Authors:  Carla M Yuede; Hongxin Dong; John G Csernansky
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Dose-dependent effects of ladostigil on microglial activation and cognition in aged rats.

Authors:  Marta Weinstock; Corina Bejar; Donna Schorer-Apelbaum; Rony Panarsky; Lisandro Luques; Shai Shoham
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Hormesis and medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  What have we learned from the streptozotocin-induced animal model of sporadic Alzheimer's disease, about the therapeutic strategies in Alzheimer's research.

Authors:  Melita Salkovic-Petrisic; Ana Knezovic; Siegfried Hoyer; Peter Riederer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.