BACKGROUND: Surgical oncology as a distinct field of expertise is fairly young. The current study was designed to gain a better understanding of the attitude of practicing physicians toward the field of surgical oncology. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-seven physicians in the San Gabriel Valley (a suburban area adjacent to Los Angeles) responded to an anonymous survey of opinions regarding surgical oncology. Responses were placed into a computerized database. RESULTS: Of those responding, 179 were primary care physicians, 52 were general surgeons, 78 were gynecologists, and 18 were medical oncologists. Overall, 89% of physicians were familiar with the field of surgical oncology, but only 47% had ever heard of The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO). Ninety-four percent of the respondents felt that a surgical oncologist should care for patients with complex cancer, and 63% of respondents felt that surgical oncologists should care only for patients with complex cancer. Familiarity with the field of surgical oncology and with the SSO correlated with the percentage of the physicians practice that was cancer related. Only 22% of physicians felt that the field of surgical oncology is redundant to the general surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the survey indicate that there is considerable recognition of the unique expertise of the surgical oncologist by the medical community. Unfortunately, many physicians are not familiar with the SSO. Educating physicians in the community about the SSO may help to further expand the role of the surgical oncologist in the care of the patient with cancer, standardize the expectations of the skills and training of a surgical oncologist, and set a benchmark for the surgical subspecialty.
BACKGROUND: Surgical oncology as a distinct field of expertise is fairly young. The current study was designed to gain a better understanding of the attitude of practicing physicians toward the field of surgical oncology. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-seven physicians in the San Gabriel Valley (a suburban area adjacent to Los Angeles) responded to an anonymous survey of opinions regarding surgical oncology. Responses were placed into a computerized database. RESULTS: Of those responding, 179 were primary care physicians, 52 were general surgeons, 78 were gynecologists, and 18 were medical oncologists. Overall, 89% of physicians were familiar with the field of surgical oncology, but only 47% had ever heard of The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO). Ninety-four percent of the respondents felt that a surgical oncologist should care for patients with complex cancer, and 63% of respondents felt that surgical oncologists should care only for patients with complex cancer. Familiarity with the field of surgical oncology and with the SSO correlated with the percentage of the physicians practice that was cancer related. Only 22% of physicians felt that the field of surgical oncology is redundant to the general surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the survey indicate that there is considerable recognition of the unique expertise of the surgical oncologist by the medical community. Unfortunately, many physicians are not familiar with the SSO. Educating physicians in the community about the SSO may help to further expand the role of the surgical oncologist in the care of the patient with cancer, standardize the expectations of the skills and training of a surgical oncologist, and set a benchmark for the surgical subspecialty.
Authors: C M Balch; K I Bland; M F Brennan; J L Cameron; B A Chabner; E M Copeland; W J Hoskins; C P Karakousis; J E Niederhuber; R E Pollock Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 5.344