Literature DB >> 8790700

Do you understand?: an ethical assessment of researchers' description of the consenting process.

S L Titus1, M A Keane.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8790700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN： 1046-7890


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The Ethical Concerns of Seeking Consent from Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients for Research - A Matter of Possessing Capacity or Surrogate Insight.

Authors:  Avelino C Verceles; Waqas Bhatti
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2018-03-19

2.  Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?

Authors:  C Kerr; E Robinson; A Stevens; D Braunholtz; S Edwards; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards.

Authors:  Henry Silverman
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  Understood consent versus informed consent: a new paradigm for obtaining consent for pediatric research studies.

Authors:  Alan F Isles
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/07/011).

Authors:  Clare Moynihan; Rebecca Lewis; Emma Hall; Emma Jones; Alison Birtle; Robert Huddart
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.279
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.