W J Rogan1. 1. Office of Clinical Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. rogan@niehs.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review data on the occurrence and toxicity of the commonly reported pesticides and industrial environmental pollutant chemicals in breast milk. DATA SOURCES: Continuous automated literature surveillance plus contact with investigators and governmental agencies. STUDY SELECTIONS: For data on occurrence, the most recent data from the largest data sets on the most representative donors were used. For data on toxicity, the primary report that was publicly available was used. DATA EXTRACTION: When necessary, data were reexpressed or concentrations were rescaled. The original investigator was contacted if necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although pollutant chemicals are readily detected in most human milk worldwide, there is little evidence for consequent morbidity in nurslings. There have been several mass poisonings in which chemicals that were transmitted through breast milk clearly affected children who were breast-fed, and there is some evidence that prenatal exposure to background levels resulted in mild developmental delay and that lactation per se was disturbed. CONCLUSIONS: Breast-feeding is recommended despite the presence of chemical residues. The prenatal period in the child and the initiation of lactation in the mother may be sensitive periods to the toxicity of the chemicals that are considered here, and the potential for poisoning at higher levels is clear. However, in the vast majority of women, the benefits of breast-feeding appear to outweigh the risks, and those who advise women about infant nutrition should continue to support breast-feeding.
OBJECTIVE: To review data on the occurrence and toxicity of the commonly reported pesticides and industrial environmental pollutant chemicals in breast milk. DATA SOURCES: Continuous automated literature surveillance plus contact with investigators and governmental agencies. STUDY SELECTIONS: For data on occurrence, the most recent data from the largest data sets on the most representative donors were used. For data on toxicity, the primary report that was publicly available was used. DATA EXTRACTION: When necessary, data were reexpressed or concentrations were rescaled. The original investigator was contacted if necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although pollutant chemicals are readily detected in most human milk worldwide, there is little evidence for consequent morbidity in nurslings. There have been several mass poisonings in which chemicals that were transmitted through breast milk clearly affected children who were breast-fed, and there is some evidence that prenatal exposure to background levels resulted in mild developmental delay and that lactation per se was disturbed. CONCLUSIONS: Breast-feeding is recommended despite the presence of chemical residues. The prenatal period in the child and the initiation of lactation in the mother may be sensitive periods to the toxicity of the chemicals that are considered here, and the potential for poisoning at higher levels is clear. However, in the vast majority of women, the benefits of breast-feeding appear to outweigh the risks, and those who advise women about infant nutrition should continue to support breast-feeding.
Authors: Nicole M Gatto; Matthew P Longnecker; Michael F Press; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Leslie Bernstein Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Susan Hurley; Debbie Goldberg; June-Soo Park; Myrto Petreas; Leslie Bernstein; Hoda Anton-Culver; Susan L Neuhausen; David O Nelson; Peggy Reynolds Journal: Environ Int Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Amy M Branum; Gwen W Collman; Adolfo Correa; Sarah A Keim; Woodie Kessel; Carole A Kimmel; Mark A Klebanoff; Matthew P Longnecker; Pauline Mendola; Marc Rigas; Sherry G Selevan; Peter C Scheidt; Kenneth Schoendorf; Eleanor Smith-Khuri; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Philip J Landrigan; Babasaheb Sonawane; Donald Mattison; Michael McCally; Anjali Garg Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.031