Literature DB >> 8790022

Randomized comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double-bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID II Investigators.

C Bode1, R W Smalling, G Berg, C Burnett, G Lorch, J M Kalbfleisch, R Chernoff, L G Christie, R L Feldman, A A Seals, W D Weaver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic benefit of thrombolytic therapy has been shown to correlate directly with completeness (TIMI grade 3 flow) and speed of reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery. The purpose of the RAPID II study was to determine whether a double-bolus regimen of reteplase, a recently developed deletion mutant of wild-type tissue plasminogen activator, could improve 90-minute coronary artery patency rates achieved with the most successful standard regimen, an "accelerated" front-loaded infusion of alteplase. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-four patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive (along with intravenous heparin and aspirin) either a 10 plus 10 megaunits double bolus of reteplase or front-loaded alteplase. The primary end point of "patency at 90 minutes, graded according to the TIMI classification" was centrally assessed in a blinded fashion. Infarctrelated coronary artery patency (TIMI grade 2 or 3) and complete patency (TIMI grade 3) at 90 minutes after the start of thrombolytic therapy were significantly higher in the reteplase-treated patients (TIMI grade 2 or 3: 83.4% versus 73.3% for front-loaded alteplase-treated patients, P = .03; TIMI grade 3: 59.9% versus 45.2%, P = .01). At 60 minutes, the incidence of both, patency and complete patency, was also significantly higher in reteplase-treated patients (reteplase versus alteplase, TIMI grade 2 or 3: 81.8% versus 66.1%, P = .01; TIMI grade 3: 51.2% versus 37.4%, P < .03). Reteplase-treated patients required fewer acute additional coronary interventions (13.6% versus 26.5%, P < .01), and 35-day mortality was 4.1% for reteplase and 8.4% for alteplase (P = NS). There were no significant differences between reteplase and alteplase in bleedings requiring a transfusion (12.4% versus 9.7%) or hemorrhagic stroke (1.2% versus 1.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Reteplase, when given as a double bolus of 10 plus 10 megaunits to patients with acute myocardial infarction, achieves significantly higher rates of early reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and requires significantly fewer acute coronary interventions than front-loaded alteplase without an apparent increased risk of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8790022     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  43 in total

Review 1.  New thrombolytics, anticoagulants, and platelet antagonists: the future of clinical practice.

Authors:  R C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Third Irish Working Party Consensus. Irish Thrombolysis Concenus Group.

Authors:  A Brown; J Horgan; M Conway; W Fennell; H McCann; B Meaney; M O'Reilly; P Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Platelet activation in acute myocardial infarction and the rationale for combination therapy.

Authors:  I Conde-Pozzi; N Kleiman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Current clinical use of reteplase for thrombolysis. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic perspective.

Authors:  U Martin; B Kaufmann; G Neugebauer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Thrombolysis: newer thrombolytic agents and their role in clinical medicine.

Authors:  T K Nordt; C Bode
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Impact of type of thrombolytic agent on in-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in the Middle East.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Amr Ali; Mohammad Zubaid; Prashanth Panduranga; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmed Abusham; Wael Almahmeed; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Haitham Amin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Optimizing the use of thrombolytics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael A Morse; Josh W Todd; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  The evolution of recombinant thrombolytics: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Yogender Pal Khasa
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.269

10.  Human complement receptor type 1-directed loading of tissue plasminogen activator on circulating erythrocytes for prophylactic fibrinolysis.

Authors:  Sergei Zaitsev; Kristina Danielyan; Juan-Carlos Murciano; Kumkum Ganguly; Tatiana Krasik; Ronald P Taylor; Steven Pincus; Steven Jones; Douglas B Cines; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.