Literature DB >> 8789085

A comparison of structural and dynamic properties of different simulation methods applied to SH3.

D M van Aalten1, A Amadei, R Bywater, J B Findlay, H J Berendsen, C Sander, P F Stouten.   

Abstract

The dynamic and static properties of molecular dynamics simulations using various methods for treating solvent were compared. The SH3 protein domain was chosen as a test case because of its small size and high surface-to-volume ratio. The simulations were analyzed in structural terms by examining crystal packing, distribution of polar residues, and conservation of secondary structure. In addition, the "essential dynamics" method was applied to compare each of the molecular dynamics trajectories with a full solvent simulation. This method proved to be a powerful tool for the comparison of large concerted atomic motions in SH3. It identified methods of simulation that yielded significantly different dynamic properties compared to the full solvent simulation. Simulating SH3 using the stochastic dynamics algorithm with a vacuum (reduced charge) force field produced properties close to those of the full solvent simulation. The application of a recently described solvation term did not improve the dynamic properties. The large concerted atomic motions in the full solvent simulation as revealed by the essential dynamics method were analyzed for possible biological implications. Two loops, which have been shown to be involved in ligand binding, were seen to move in concert to open and close the ligand-binding site.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8789085      PMCID: PMC1224968          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79608-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  11 in total

1.  Solution structure of the SH3 domain of Src and identification of its ligand-binding site.

Authors:  H Yu; M K Rosen; T B Shin; C Seidel-Dugan; J S Brugge; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

3.  Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1992-04-27       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Crystal structure of a Src-homology 3 (SH3) domain.

Authors:  A Musacchio; M Noble; R Pauptit; R Wierenga; M Saraste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Crystal structure of the SH3 domain in human Fyn; comparison of the three-dimensional structures of SH3 domains in tyrosine kinases and spectrin.

Authors:  M E Noble; A Musacchio; M Saraste; S A Courtneidge; R K Wierenga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains.

Authors:  H Yu; J K Chen; S Feng; D C Dalgarno; A W Brauer; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The essential dynamics of thermolysin: confirmation of the hinge-bending motion and comparison of simulations in vacuum and water.

Authors:  D M van Aalten; A Amadei; A B Linssen; V G Eijsink; G Vriend; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-05

8.  High-resolution crystal structures of tyrosine kinase SH3 domains complexed with proline-rich peptides.

Authors:  A Musacchio; M Saraste; M Wilmanns
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1994-08

9.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Essential dynamics of proteins.

Authors:  A Amadei; A B Linssen; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-12
View more
  10 in total

1.  Conformational substates in different crystal forms of the photoactive yellow protein--correlation with theoretical and experimental flexibility.

Authors:  D M van Aalten; W Crielaard; K J Hellingwerf; L Joshua-Tor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  1H and 15N NMR assignment and solution structure of the SH3 domain of spectrin: comparison of unrefined and refined structure sets with the crystal structure.

Authors:  F J Blanco; A R Ortiz; L Serrano
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  New insights in the activation of human cholesterol esterase to design potent anti-cholesterol drugs.

Authors:  Shalini John; Sundarapandian Thangapandian; Prettina Lazar; Minky Son; Chanin Park; Keun Woo Lee
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  Protein dynamics derived from clusters of crystal structures.

Authors:  D M van Aalten; D A Conn; B L de Groot; H J Berendsen; J B Findlay; A Amadei
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The consistency of large concerted motions in proteins in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  B L de Groot; D M van Aalten; A Amadei; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. I. ligand-induced changes in the protein motions.

Authors:  G H Peters; T M Frimurer; J N Andersen; O H Olsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Essential motions and energetic contributions of individual residues in a peptide bound to an SH3 domain.

Authors:  J Kolafa; J W Perram; R P Bywater
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Dynamics of proteins in different solvent systems: analysis of essential motion in lipases.

Authors:  G H Peters; D M van Aalten; O Edholm; S Toxvaerd; R Bywater
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Conformational analysis of retinoids and restriction of their dynamics by retinoid-binding proteins.

Authors:  D M van Aalten; B L de Groot; H J Berendsen; J B Findlay
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  The fate of proteins in outer space.

Authors:  Gavin M Seddon; Robert P Bywater
Journal:  Int J Astrobiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.673

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.