Literature DB >> 8789071

Designing EMF experiments: what is required to characterize "exposure"?

P A Valberg1.   

Abstract

Anyone who has attempted to organize and synthesize the results of research on biological effects of electric and magnetic fields (EMF) has experienced frustration when trying to evaluate the comparability of EMF exposures among separate studies. Reporting of exposure characteristics is often incomplete, and some investigators focus on particular nuances of exposure, which in other laboratories go unrecorded because they are not regarded as important. The obstacles encountered when comparing studies, when designing replication studies, and when evaluating research proposals could be reduced were a more standardized approach taken in describing "EMF exposure." To this end, a numerical listing of 18 separate parameters important to EMF exposure characterization is proposed. Although the goal of this list is primarily to expedite the description of EMF exposure, references are provided to examples of EMF exposures and to detailed discussions of EMF exposure systems.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8789071     DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250160608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  9 in total

1.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  E van Wijngaarden; D A Savitz; R C Kleckner; J Cai; D Loomis
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields and suicide among electric utility workers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  E van Wijngaarden; D A Savitz; R C Kleckner; J Cai; D Loomis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Harvard report on cancer prevention. Causes of human cancer. Electric and magnetic fields.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  High power electromagnetic pulse applicators for evaluation of biological effects induced by electromagnetic radiation waves.

Authors:  Flavien Pillet; Laure Gibot; Alexandre Catrain; Jelena Kolosnjaj-Tabi; Kristelle Courtois; Thomas Chretiennot; Elisabeth Bellard; Jacques Tarayre; Muriel Golzio; René Vezinet; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Assessment of foetal exposure to the homogeneous magnetic field harmonic spectrum generated by electricity transmission and distribution networks.

Authors:  Serena Fiocchi; Ilaria Liorni; Marta Parazzini; Paolo Ravazzani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Biological effects of exposure to static electric fields in humans and vertebrates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Petri; Kristina Schmiedchen; Dominik Stunder; Dagmar Dechent; Thomas Kraus; William H Bailey; Sarah Driessen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  EMF exposure variation among MRI sequences from pediatric examination protocols.

Authors:  Jennifer Frankel; Kjell Hansson Mild; Johan Olsrud; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.010

8.  Biological and health-related effects of weak static magnetic fields (≤ 1 mT) in humans and vertebrates: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Driessen; Lambert Bodewein; Dagmar Dechent; David Graefrath; Kristina Schmiedchen; Dominik Stunder; Thomas Kraus; Anne-Kathrin Petri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Theoretical Concepts in Magnetobiology after 40 Years of Research.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Andrei B Rubin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.