Literature DB >> 8788276

Heterogeneity and progression of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by DNA cytofluorometry and the significance of the presence of polyploid cells.

M Kushima1, R Kushima, T Hattori, T Tomoyoshi.   

Abstract

With special attention to the presence of polyploid cells, we examined heterogeneity and progression of renal cell carcinomas. We separated 116 blocks from 51 tumors into several specimens according to the histologic findings, and analyzed their DNA ploidy patterns. Thirty-one tumors (61%) were aneuploid, 29 of which showed intratumoral DNA ploidy heterogeneity. Diploid cell lines were observed in 47 tumors (92%). Polyploid cells in the diploid component were more frequently found in tumors with mixed diploid and aneuploid patterns than in the purely diploid tumors. Of the diploid cases, higher stage cases tended to have a higher incidence of polyploid cells than the lower stage cases. The incidence of aneuploid cases and DNA heterogeneity became greater as the tumors progressed. Aneuploid cases had a poorer outcome than did the diploid cases. If diploid cases with polyploid cells were classified as aneuploid cases, the difference in the survival rate between the diploid and aneuploid cases became more significant. Diploid renal cell carcinomas with polyploid cells may be an intermediate stage between diploidy and aneuploidy. Analyzing renal cell carcinomas for the presence of polyploid cells is useful for differentiating diploidy, which is actually aneuploid, from pure diploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8788276     DOI: 10.1007/bf00698739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  15 in total

1.  DNA flow cytometry as a predictor of outcome of stage I renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Grignon; A el-Naggar; L K Green; A G Ayala; J Y Ro; D A Swanson; P Troncoso; D McLemore; G G Giacco; V F Guinee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Renal cell carcinoma. A clinicopathologic and DNA flow cytometric analysis of 103 cases.

Authors:  D J Grignon; A G Ayala; A el-Naggar; K I Wishnow; J Y Ro; D A Swanson; D McLemore; G G Giacco; V F Guinee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  [Tumor heterogeneity in DNA ploidy of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by static cytofluorometry and flow cytometry].

Authors:  M Kushima; T Konishi; Y Okada; T Tomoyoshi; R Kushima; T Hattori
Journal:  Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1994-03

4.  Prognosis of renal cell carcinoma related to nuclear grade, DNA content and Robson stage.

Authors:  G Klöppel; W T Knöfel; H Baisch; U Otto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  DNA content in renal cell carcinoma with reference to tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  B Ljungberg; R Stenling; G Roos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Image analysis in the determination of ploidy and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Lanigan; P A McLean; D M Murphy; M G Donovan; M Leader
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prognostic relevance of ploidy and proliferative activity of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  H Al-Abadi; R Nagel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Flow cytometric DNA analysis of renal-cell carcinoma. A study of fine needle aspiration biopsies in comparison with multiple surgical samples.

Authors:  B Ljungberg; R Stenling; G Roos
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 0.302

9.  Flow cytometric assessment of deoxyribonucleic acid content in renal adenocarcinoma: does ploidy status enhance prognostic stratification over stage alone?

Authors:  S M Currin; S E Lee; P J Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  DNA value and prognosis of renal tumors. Differences between childhood and adult tumors.

Authors:  S Yoshida
Journal:  Acta Pathol Jpn       Date:  1992-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the clonal relationship between primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  H Bissig; J Richter; R Desper; V Meier; P Schraml; A A Schäffer; G Sauter; M J Mihatsch; H Moch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  A non-diploid DNA status is linked to poor prognosis in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Franziska Büscheck; Christoph Fraune; Martina Kluth; Maximilian Lennartz; Ronald Simon; Claudia Hube-Magg; Christian Morlock; Silvano Barbieri; Carolin Wahl; Christian Eichelberg; Christina Möller-Koop; Doris Höflmayer; Corinna Wittmer; Waldemar Wilczak; Guido Sauter; Margit Fisch; Till Eichenauer; Michael Rink
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.