Literature DB >> 8788219

Magnetic field tomography of cortical and deep processes: examples of "real-time mapping" of averaged and single trial MEG signals.

A A Ioannides1, M J Liu, L C Liu, P D Bamidis, E Hellstrand, K M Stephan.   

Abstract

Magnetic field tomography (MFT) provides 3-dimensional estimates of brain activity, from non-contact, non-invasive measurements of the magnetic field generated by coherent electrical activity in the brain. MFT analysis of averaged auditory "odd-ball" data show cortical and deep activation, presumably from the amygdala and hippocampus. These results are compared with MFT estimates obtained from a patient who had undergone lobectomy which removed these structures. The variability from subject to subject is confounded by variability between trials for the same subject; the relationship between the averaged and single trials is probed by bi-hemispheric simultaneous measurements performed under the same odd-ball paradigm and by MFT analysis of auditory evoked data and interictal epileptic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8788219     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  19 in total

1.  Coupling of regional activations in a human brain during an object and face affect recognition task.

Authors:  A A Ioannides; L C Liu; J Kwapien; S Drozdz; M Streit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Distinct neural generators of sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Terrance J Williams; Keith H Nuechterlein; Kenneth L Subotnik; Cindy M Yee
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Emotional automaticity is a matter of timing.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Tom Holroyd; Catherine Majestic; Xi Cheng; Julia Schechter; R James Blair
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Arjan Hillebrand; Krish D Singh; Ian E Holliday; Paul L Furlong; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neural dynamics for facial threat processing as revealed by gamma band synchronization using MEG.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Tom Holroyd; Matthew Jones; Talma Hendler; James Blair
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Visual field and task influence illusory figure responses.

Authors:  Afiza Abu Bakar; Lichan Liu; Markus Conci; Mark A Elliott; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  A correlation study of averaged and single trial MEG signals: the average describes multiple histories each in a different set of single trials.

Authors:  L Liu; A A Ioannides
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  How 'love' and 'hate' differ from 'sleep': using combined electro/magnetoencephalographic data to reveal the sources of early cortical responses to emotional words.

Authors:  Kati Keuper; Peter Zwanzger; Marisa Nordt; Annuschka Eden; Inga Laeger; Pienie Zwitserlood; Johanna Kissler; Markus Junghöfer; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Emotion separation is completed early and it depends on visual field presentation.

Authors:  Lichan Liu; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Emotion and attention effects: is it all a matter of timing? Not yet.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.