Literature DB >> 8788093

Astringent subqualities in acids.

C J Thomas1, H T Lawless.   

Abstract

Astringency, astringent subqualities (drying, roughing and puckering) and sourness were compared among six acids: hydrochloric, lactic, citric, acetic, fumaric and malic acids. The attribute profiles of organic acids were similar to each other but different from hydrochloric acid, the only inorganic acid, which was the most astringent and the least sour. In a second experiment, two inorganic acids (hydrochloric and phosphoric) and two organic acids (citric and malic) were tested at three concentration levels. At approximately equal levels of overall sensory impact, the inorganic acids were alike in astringency and sourness, receiving higher ratings for roughing and drying, and lower ratings for sourness than the organic acids. Interactions with concentration (differences in psychophysical functions) for the subquality of drying were noted, in addition to the differences in the astringent subqualities of roughing and drying seen across acids in both experiments. The higher level of astringency for inorganic acids suggests that the current model for tannin binding to salivary proteins as an explanation of astringency needs to be extended to include a direct pH-dependent effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8788093     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/20.6.593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  6 in total

1.  Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.

Authors:  Danielle Nachtigal; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  The K+ channel KIR2.1 functions in tandem with proton influx to mediate sour taste transduction.

Authors:  Wenlei Ye; Rui B Chang; Jeremy D Bushman; Yu-Hsiang Tu; Eric M Mulhall; Courtney E Wilson; Alexander J Cooper; Wallace S Chick; David C Hill-Eubanks; Mark T Nelson; Sue C Kinnamon; Emily R Liman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Sorting, and Polarized Sensory Positioning (PSP) with Astringent Stimuli.

Authors:  Erin E Fleming; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.565

4.  Perceptual mapping of chemesthetic stimuli in naïve assessors.

Authors:  Nadia Byrnes; Michael A Nestrud; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Investigating Mixture Interactions of Astringent Stimuli Using the Isobole Approach.

Authors:  Erin E Fleming; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Di Stefano; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.