Literature DB >> 8787876

Generation and characterization of variants of NWS/G70C influenza virus after in vitro passage in 4-amino-Neu5Ac2en and 4-guanidino-Neu5Ac2en.

J L McKimm-Breschkin1, T J Blick, A Sahasrabudhe, T Tiong, D Marshall, G J Hart, R C Bethell, C R Penn.   

Abstract

The compounds 4-amino-Neu5Ac2en (5-acetylamino-2,6-anhydro-4-amino-3,4,5- trideoxy-D-glycerol-D-galacto-non-2-enoic acid) and 4-guanidino-Neu5Ac2en (5-acetylamino-2,6-anhydro-4-guanidino-3,4,5- trideoxy-D-glycerol-D-galacto-non-2-enoic acid), which selectively inhibit the influenza virus neuraminidase, have been tested in vitro for their ability to generate drug-resistant variants. NWS/G70C virus (H1N9) was cultured in each drug by limiting-dilution passaging. After five or six passages in either compound, there emerged viruses which had a reduced sensitivity to the inhibitors in cell culture. Variant viruses were up to 1,000-fold less sensitive in plaque assays, liquid culture, and a hemagglutination-elution assay. In addition, cross-resistance to both compounds was seen in all three assays. Some isolates demonstrated drug dependence with an increase in both size and number of plaques in a plaque assay and an increase in virus yield in liquid culture in the presence of inhibitors. No significant difference in neuraminidase enzyme activity was detected in vitro, and no sequence changes in the conserved sites of the neuraminidase were found. However, changes in conserved amino acids in the hemagglutinin were detected. These amino acids were associated with either the hemagglutinin receptor binding site, Thr-155, or the left edge of the receptor binding pocket, Val-223 and Arg-229. Hence, mutations at these sites could be expected to affect the affinity or specificity of the hemagglutinin binding. Compensating mutations resulting in a weakly binding hemagglutinin thus seem to be circumventing the inhibition of the neuraminidase by allowing the virus to be released from cells with less dependence on the neuraminidase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8787876      PMCID: PMC163053     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants.

Authors:  M DIXON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1953-08       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  The behavior and significance of slow-binding enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  J F Morrison; C T Walsh
Journal:  Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol       Date:  1988

3.  Influenza virus hemagglutinins differentiate between receptor determinants bearing N-acetyl-, N-glycollyl-, and N,O-diacetylneuraminic acids.

Authors:  H H Higa; G N Rogers; J C Paulson
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Structure of the influenza virus haemagglutinin complexed with its receptor, sialic acid.

Authors:  W Weis; J H Brown; S Cusack; J C Paulson; J J Skehel; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Inhibition of influenza virus replication in tissue culture by 2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-trifluoroacetylneuraminic acid (FANA): mechanism of action.

Authors:  P Palese; R W Compans
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Single amino acid substitutions in influenza haemagglutinin change receptor binding specificity.

Authors:  G N Rogers; J C Paulson; R S Daniels; J J Skehel; I A Wilson; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Jul 7-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Three-dimensional structure of neuraminidase of subtype N9 from an avian influenza virus.

Authors:  A T Baker; J N Varghese; W G Laver; G M Air; P M Colman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1987

8.  Relationship between mitogenic activity of influenza viruses and the receptor-binding specificity of their hemagglutinin molecules.

Authors:  E M Anders; A A Scalzo; G N Rogers; D O White
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The receptor-binding and membrane-fusion properties of influenza virus variants selected using anti-haemagglutinin monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  P S Daniels; S Jeffries; P Yates; G C Schild; G N Rogers; J C Paulson; S A Wharton; A R Douglas; J J Skehel; D C Wiley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  The molecular basis of the specific anti-influenza action of amantadine.

Authors:  A J Hay; A J Wolstenholme; J J Skehel; M H Smith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  44 in total

1.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of influenza virus mutants selected with the sialidase fusion protein DAS181.

Authors:  Gallen B Triana-Baltzer; Rebecca L Sanders; Maria Hedlund; Kellie A Jensen; Laura M Aschenbrenner; Jeffrey L Larson; Fang Fang
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Reduced susceptibility to all neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza H1N1 viruses with haemagglutinin mutations and mutations in non-conserved residues of the neuraminidase.

Authors:  Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin; Janelle Williams; Susan Barrett; Kim Jachno; Mandy McDonald; Peter G Mohr; Takehiko Saito; Masato Tashiro
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Zanamivir.

Authors:  S L Waghorn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Characterization of drug-resistant influenza virus A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) variants selected in vitro with laninamivir.

Authors:  Mélanie Samson; Yacine Abed; François-Marc Desrochers; Stephanie Hamilton; Angela Luttick; Simon P Tucker; Melinda J Pryor; Guy Boivin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Generation and characterization of a mutant of influenza A virus selected with the neuraminidase inhibitor BCX-140.

Authors:  S Bantia; A A Ghate; S L Ananth; Y S Babu; G M Air; G M Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  How sticky should a virus be? The impact of virus binding and release on transmission fitness using influenza as an example.

Authors:  Andreas Handel; Victoria Akin; Sergei S Pilyugin; Veronika Zarnitsyna; Rustom Antia
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Effect of oseltamivir carboxylate consumption on emergence of drug-resistant H5N2 avian influenza virus in Mallard ducks.

Authors:  Jenna E Achenbach; Richard A Bowen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of neuraminidase enzyme assays using different substrates to measure susceptibility of influenza virus clinical isolates to neuraminidase inhibitors: report of the neuraminidase inhibitor susceptibility network.

Authors:  N T Wetherall; T Trivedi; J Zeller; C Hodges-Savola; J L McKimm-Breschkin; M Zambon; F G Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Structural and functional basis of resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza B viruses.

Authors:  Aaron J Oakley; Susan Barrett; Thomas S Peat; Janet Newman; Victor A Streltsov; Lynne Waddington; Takehiko Saito; Masato Tashiro; Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Reduced sensitivity of influenza A (H5N1) to oseltamivir.

Authors:  Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin; Paul W Selleck; Tri Bhakti Usman; Michael A Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.