Literature DB >> 8786960

Intra- and inter-subject variabilities of CGP 33101 after replicate single oral doses of two 200-mg tablets and 400-mg suspension.

W K Cheung1, F Kianifard, A Wong, J Mathieu, T Cook, V John, E Redalieu, K Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use a replicate designed trial to assess the overall, intra- and inter-subject variabilities in pharmacokinetic parameters of CGP 33101 after oral administration of tablets relative to that of powder suspended in water, and to determine the relative proportion of the intra-subject variance to the overall variability.
METHODS: Sixteen healthy subjects were randomly assigned to four groups to receive tablets and suspension twice in four different treatment sequences. The plasma concentration-time profile of CGP 33101 was characterized in terms of Cmax, Tmax, and AUC. Bioavailability of tablets relative to suspension and intra- and inter-subject variability were assessed by statistical analysis. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The overall variabilities in absorption kinetics of CGP 33101 in healthy subjects were small with CV's of the population mean values for AUC and Cmax less than 26% for both tablets and suspension. Contribution of intra-subject variability to the overall variability was also small (approximately 20%). Both the overall and intra-subject variabilities of AUC and Cmax after suspension were larger than after the tablets. However, the differences in variability between tablets and suspension were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The tablet formulation was bioequivalent to suspension in terms of rate and extent of absorption based on 90% conventional confidence intervals (for AUC and Cmax) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for Tmax).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8786960     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016275402723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  10 in total

1.  An automated method for the determination of a new potential antiepileptic agent (CGP 33101) in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  L A Brunner; M L Powell
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

3.  Intra- and intersubject variability: mixed-effects statistical analysis of repeated doses of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, CGS 16617.

Authors:  G M Kochak; R A Smith; R L Choi; V John; V Tipnis; F Honc; J K deSilva; D J Weidler
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Individual differences in the disposition of drugs metabolised in the body.

Authors:  G Alvan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The use of non-parametric methods in the statistical analysis of the two-period change-over design.

Authors:  G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bio-International 92, conference on bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  H H Blume; K K Midha
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailability.

Authors:  B E Rodda; R L Davis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  The assessment of the intrasubject variability in digoxin absorption in man from two oral dosage forms.

Authors:  A Yacobi; R G Stoll; G C Chao; R A Schwartz; D J Weidler; J W Ayers; E Sakmar; M Hallmark; J G Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Intrasubject variation in sustained-release theophylline absorption.

Authors:  R A Dederich; S J Szefler; E R Green
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Implications of intraindividual variability in bioavailability studies of furosemide.

Authors:  A Grahnén; M Hammarlund; T Lundqvist
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Rufinamide for pediatric patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Heather Ann Wier; Ana Cerna; Tsz-Yin So
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Rufinamide.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Treating Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in epileptic pediatric patients with third-generation rufinamide.

Authors:  Jessica Gresham; Lea S Eiland; Allison M Chung
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.570

4.  Onset of action and seizure control in Lennox-Gaustaut syndrome: focus on rufinamide.

Authors:  Russell P Saneto; Gail D Anderson
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  Adjunctive Rufinamide in Children with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Ganna Balagura; Antonella Riva; Francesca Marchese; Alberto Verrotti; Pasquale Striano
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Role of rufinamide in the management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (childhood epileptic encephalopathy).

Authors:  Gerhard Kluger; Bettina Bauer
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.