Literature DB >> 8786356

Cardiac sodium channels (hH1) are intrinsically more sensitive to block by lidocaine than are skeletal muscle (mu 1) channels.

H B Nuss1, G F Tomaselli, E Marbán.   

Abstract

When lidocaine is given systemically, cardiac Na channels are blocked preferentially over those in skeletal muscle and nerve. This apparent increased affinity is commonly assumed to arise solely from the fact that cardiac Na channels spend a large fraction of their time in the inactivated state, which exhibits a high affinity for local anesthetics. The oocyte expression system was used to compare systematically the sensitivities of skeletal (mu 1-beta 1) and cardiac (hH1-beta 1) Na channels to block by lidocaine, under conditions in which the only difference was the choice of alpha subunit. To check for differences in tonic block, Na currents were elicited after 3 min of exposure to various lidocaine concentrations at -100 mV, a potential at which both hH1-beta 1 and mu 1-beta 1 channels were fully reprimed. Surprisingly, hH1-beta 1 Na channels were threefold more sensitive to rested-state block by lidocaine (402 +/- 36 microM, n = 4-22) than were mu 1-beta 1 Na channels (1,168 +/- 34 microM, n = 7-19). In contrast, the inactivated state binding affinities determined at partially depolarized holding potentials (h infinity approximately 0.2) were similar (Kd = 16 +/- 1 microM, n = 3-9 for hH1-beta 1 and 12 +/- 2 microM, n = 4-11 for mu 1-beta 1). Lidocaine produced more use-dependent block of peak hH1-beta 1 Na current elicited by trains of short-(10 ms) or long- (1 s) duration step depolarizations (0.5 Hz, -20 mV) than of mu 1-beta 1 Na current. During exposure to lidocaine, hH1-beta 1 channels recover from inactivation at -100 mV after a prolonged delay (20 ms), while mu 1-beta 1 channels begin repriming immediately. The overall time course of recovery from inactivation in the presence of lidocaine is much slower in hH1-beta 1 than in mu 1-beta 1 channels. These unexpected findings suggest that structural differences in the alpha subunits impart intrinsically different lidocaine sensitivities to the two isoforms. The differences in steady state affinities and in repriming kinetics are both in the correct direction to help explain the increased potency of cardiac Na channel block by local anesthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8786356      PMCID: PMC2229307          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.106.6.1193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  22 in total

1.  Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating.

Authors:  H B Nuss; N G Kambouris; E Marbán; G F Tomaselli; J R Balser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Channel cytoplasmic loops alter voltage-dependent sodium channel activation in an isoform-specific manner.

Authors:  E S Bennett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differences in steady-state inactivation between Na channel isoforms affect local anesthetic binding affinity.

Authors:  S N Wright; S Y Wang; R G Kallen; G K Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Contribution of the tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.9 to sensory transmission and nociceptive behavior.

Authors:  Birgit T Priest; Beth A Murphy; Jill A Lindia; Carmen Diaz; Catherine Abbadie; Amy M Ritter; Paul Liberator; Leslie M Iyer; Shera F Kash; Martin G Kohler; Gregory J Kaczorowski; D Euan MacIntyre; William J Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Common molecular determinants of local anesthetic, antiarrhythmic, and anticonvulsant block of voltage-gated Na+ channels.

Authors:  D S Ragsdale; J C McPhee; T Scheuer; W A Catterall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cannabidiol protects against high glucose-induced oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in cardiac voltage-gated sodium channels.

Authors:  Mohamed A Fouda; Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo; Peter C Ruben
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Isoform-specific effects of sialic acid on voltage-dependent Na+ channel gating: functional sialic acids are localized to the S5-S6 loop of domain I.

Authors:  Eric S Bennett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Lidocaine induces a slow inactivated state in rat skeletal muscle sodium channels.

Authors:  Z Chen; B H Ong; N G Kambouris; E Marbán; G F Tomaselli; J R Balser
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Differential binding of tetrodotoxin and its derivatives to voltage-sensitive sodium channel subtypes (Nav 1.1 to Nav 1.7).

Authors:  Tadaaki Tsukamoto; Yukie Chiba; Minoru Wakamori; Tomoshi Yamada; Shunsuke Tsunogae; Yuko Cho; Ryo Sakakibara; Takuya Imazu; Shouta Tokoro; Yoshiki Satake; Masaatsu Adachi; Toshio Nishikawa; Mari Yotsu-Yamashita; Keiichi Konoki
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  State-dependent cocaine block of sodium channel isoforms, chimeras, and channels coexpressed with the beta1 subunit.

Authors:  S N Wright; S Y Wang; Y F Xiao; G K Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.