Literature DB >> 8786330

Di- and trinucleotide target preferences of somatic mutagenesis in normal and autoreactive B cells.

D S Smith1, G Creadon, P K Jena, J P Portanova, B L Kotzin, L J Wysocki.   

Abstract

During Ag-driven development of memory B cells, Ab V genes are modified by somatic mutagenesis. Although V gene somatic mutations have important biologic consequences in both physiologic and autoimmune Ab responses, little is known about the mechanism of mutation, or whether it operates normally in autoreactive B cells. To approach these issues, we analyzed somatic mutations in Ab genes for evidence of sequence-specific target preferences. Our analysis was confined to noncoding segments of V genes so that the intrinsic characteristics of the somatic mutation process could be reliably dissociated from the indirect but substantial influences of cellular selection. We consistently observed that some dinucleotides, GC and TA in particular, mutated at frequencies that were higher than expected based on their frequency of occurrence. Most of the dinucleotide mutation preferences could not be extrapolated directly from mononucleotide mutation preferences. Specific trinucleotides, including AGC, TAC, and their inverse repeats (GCT, GTA), also mutated more frequently than expected. These and other mutation characteristics were virtually indistinguishable in V genes of normal and autoreactive B cells. An analysis of mutations in published flanking sequences confirmed the target preferences, as did an examination of reported "hot spots" within coding V sequences. The shared preferences in coding and noncoding regions of V genes suggests that somatic mutations are generated de novo. Collectively, our findings indicate that the somatic mutation process exhibits sequence-specific preferences, consistent with an untemplated mechanism, and appears to operate similarly in normal and autoreactive B cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8786330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  59 in total

Review 1.  Altered spectra of hypermutation in DNA repair-deficient mice.

Authors:  D B Winter; P J Gearhart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin and non-immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  U Storb; H M Shen; N Michael; N Kim
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Induction of Ig somatic hypermutation and class switching in a human monoclonal IgM+ IgD+ B cell line in vitro: definition of the requirements and modalities of hypermutation.

Authors:  H Zan; A Cerutti; P Dramitinos; A Schaffer; Z Li; P Casali
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  The translesion DNA polymerase zeta plays a major role in Ig and bcl-6 somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  H Zan; A Komori; Z Li; A Cerutti; A Schaffer; M F Flajnik; M Diaz; P Casali
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 31.745

5.  Signals sustaining human immunoglobulin V gene hypermutation in isolated germinal centre B cells.

Authors:  K Dahlenborg; J D Pound; J Gordon; C A Borrebaeck; R Carlsson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Diversification of the Ig variable region gene repertoire of synovial B lymphocytes by nucleotide insertion and deletion.

Authors:  Yasushi Miura; Charles C Chu; David M Dines; Stanley E Asnis; Richard A Furie; Nicholas Chiorazzi
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2003 May-Aug       Impact factor: 6.354

7.  Modulation of base-specific mutation and recombination rates enables functional adaptation within the context of the genetic code.

Authors:  Taison Tan; Leonard D Bogarad; Michael W Deem
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Strong intrinsic biases towards mutation and conservation of bases in human IgVH genes during somatic hypermutation prevent statistical analysis of antigen selection.

Authors:  D K Dunn-Walters; J Spencer
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Frequent occurrence of deletions and duplications during somatic hypermutation: implications for oncogene translocations and heavy chain disease.

Authors:  T Goossens; U Klein; R Küppers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Somatic mutagenesis in autoimmunity.

Authors:  Thiago Detanico; James B St Clair; Katja Aviszus; Greg Kirchenbaum; Wenzhong Guo; Lawrence J Wysocki
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.815

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.