Literature DB >> 8785616

Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions.

R Pauli1, S Hammond, J Cooke, J Ansell.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of radiographers as film readers in screening mammography. Seven radiographers received training in mammogram interpretation at a National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Training Centre. Film reading performance was assessed over a period of 1 year after training with test sets of selected screening mammograms. Actual screening performance on contemporary screening mammograms was monitored after training in relation to radiologist decisions and screening outcome. It was found that trained radiographers read mammograms to a standard comparable with that of radiologists. Film reading skills were maintained consistently over the period of this study and transferred to actual screening performance. It was concluded that radiographers could play a useful role as second readers in screening mammography. Training needs have to be assessed in relation to the role the film reading radiographer is to adopt.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8785616     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-817-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Can breast surgeons read mammograms of symptomatic patients in the one-stop breast clinic?

Authors:  M C Rao; C D Griffith; A B Griffiths
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Film-reading ability of radiographers in detecting gastric cancer during screening using X-ray examination.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Yatake; Yoshihiro Takeda; Toshizo Katsuda; Rumi Gotanda; Hideo Yamazaki; Chikazumi Kuroda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.

Authors:  R Tanaka; M Takamori; Y Uchiyama; R M Nishikawa; J Shiraishi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Intercountry analysis of breast density classification using visual grading.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Peter Hogg; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparing the performance of trained radiographers against experienced radiologists in the UK lung cancer screening (UKLS) trial.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Natalie Gartland; Bruce Barton; Diane Jones; Leigh Clements; Nicholas J Screaton; John A Holemans; Stephen W Duffy; John K Field; David R Baldwin; David M Hansell; Anand Devaraj
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad Benefield; Mary W Marsh; Bruce F Schroeder; Danielle D Durham; Bonnie C Yankaskas; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Can mammogram readers swiftly and effectively learn to interpret first post-contrast acquisition subtracted (FAST) MRI, a type of abbreviated breast MRI?: a single centre data-interpretation study.

Authors:  Lyn I Jones; Rebecca Geach; Sam A Harding; Christopher Foy; Victoria Taylor; Andrea Marshall; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Janet A Dunn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

Authors:  Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Robert A Smith; María de la Luz Carranza-Flores; Andy Bogart; Louis Martínez-Matsushita; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Carolina Ortega-Olvera; Ernesto Montemayor-Varela; Angélica Angeles-Llerenas; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo; Gilberto Sánchez-González; Olga G Martínez-Montañez; Santos R Uscanga-Sánchez; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Evaluating radiographers' diagnostic accuracy in screen-reading mammograms: what constitutes a quality study?

Authors:  Josephine C Debono; Ann E Poulos
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-14

10.  Evaluation of radiographers' mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia.

Authors:  Josephine C Debono; Ann E Poulos; Nehmat Houssami; Robin M Turner; John Boyages
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.