Literature DB >> 8785468

Drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Effects on caregiver burden and patient quality of life.

L Hollister1, N Gruber.   

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is a devastating illness that will become more common as the population ages. Although clinical diagnosis of the illness is not certain without histological examination of the brain, and misdiagnosis may occur, broad working criteria to help diagnose the likely presence of Alzheimer's disease are available. Thoughtful clinical evaluation improves diagnostic accuracy, and appropriately diagnosed patients are critical for involvement in research into new antidementia agents. Essential to the discovery of new drugs is careful measurement of illness response. A variety of scales--some aimed at patients, others at their caregivers, and yet others for clinicians--assess Alzheimer's disease severity, progression, symptom response, and quality of life. Of note, patient response is not the only measurement of treatment benefit today. Growing interest is also being placed on tracking the possible amelioration of caregiver 'burden'. This burden refers to the psychological, physical, and material costs of providing care for an Alzheimer's patient over long periods of time. A number of scales and questionnaires have been developed and are occasionally used. Many drugs have been tried in Alzheimer's disease, but very few have produced any benefit, and this is often modest. Ergoloid mesylates, initially thought to be effective, are now considered of little value. The cholinomimetic drugs, especially the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor tacrine, have provided a very modest benefit, slowing the progression of the illness for a number of months. No cognitive improvement has been noted with the various nootropic agents such as piracetam. Early studies with levacecarnine (acetyl-L-carnitine), a substance that facilitates the use of fatty acids, memantidine, the dimethyl derivative of amantidine, and the calcium channel blocker nimodipine, have shown some promise, but require larger, more rigorous studies. As mentioned above, documenting effects in individual patients is crucial; examining for potential benefit to caregivers is a growing part of research design. Current treatment efforts will become more sophisticated as a deeper understanding of the neurobiology of Alzheimer's disease develops. For the immediate future, the goal is not cure but slowing of the disease process. Achieving this limited goal would have a substantial impact on the financial and human costs of the illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8785468     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199608010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  40 in total

1.  The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects.

Authors:  G Blessed; B E Tomlinson; M Roth
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 2.  Management of neurological disorders: dementia.

Authors:  M N Rossor
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Imaging the adult brain.

Authors:  I Moseley
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  The Clinician Interview-Based Impression (CIBI): a clinician's global change rating scale in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D S Knopman; M J Knapp; S I Gracon; C S Davis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Measurement and the analysis of burden.

Authors:  R V Montgomery; D E Stull; E F Borgatta
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  1985-03

6.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  The reversible dementias: do they reverse?

Authors:  A M Clarfield
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Cognitive effects of L-deprenyl in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P N Tariot; T Sunderland; H Weingartner; D L Murphy; J A Welkowitz; K Thompson; R M Cohen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.

Authors:  B Reisberg; S H Ferris; M J de Leon; T Crook
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 10.  Memory disorders: novel treatments, clinical perspective.

Authors:  G Pepeu
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.037

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Donepezil: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Dooley; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Donepezil. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  R H Foster; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  A review of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Part 2: Issues in assessing drug effects.

Authors:  S S Salek; M D Walker; A J Bayer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  L-carnitine contributes to enhancement of neurogenesis from mesenchymal stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin and PKA pathway.

Authors:  Ezzatollah Fathi; Raheleh Farahzadi; Hojjatollah Nozad Charoudeh
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-01-05

5.  L-carnitine Effectively Induces hTERT Gene Expression of Human Adipose Tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Obtained from the Aged Subjects.

Authors:  Raheleh Farahzadi; Seyed Alireza Mesbah-Namin; Nosratollah Zarghami; Ezzatollah Fathi
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.