Literature DB >> 8783216

Nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical meridian: investigations with a callosotomy patient.

R Fendrich1, C M Wessinger, M S Gazzaniga.   

Abstract

To evaluate nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical midline, we asked a callosotomy patient to compare the orientation of square wave gratings that were presented in his opposing visual fields. The gratings were horizontally or vertically oriented and had spatial frequencies ranging from 1 to 8 cycles per degree (cpd). Retinal stabilization ensured the gratings remained properly lateralized during sustained presentations. In accord with previous investigations, when the gratings were presented for only 200 msec, or their medial edges were 2 from the vertical meridian, performance was generally at chance. However, when presentations lasted 2 sec and the medial edges of the gratings were 1 from the vertical meridian, above chance performance was obtained. Accuracy rates were highest with 2 and 4 cpd gratings, and dropped at 1 and 8 cpd. Unexpectedly, the subject performed significantly better when the gratings were offset vertically from each other than when both were displayed on the horizontal meridian. Since this improvement did not occur when gratings were presented horizontally aligned above or below the horizontal meridian, it must be distributed to the relative offset between the gratings. The data suggest a narrow zone of nasotemporal overlap at the retinal vertical midline where very limited visual information is encoded by crossed temporal and uncrossed nasal retinal ganglion cells. An experiment in which only one grating in a pair was close to the vertical meridian indicates that this zone may be more pronounced in the nasal hemiretina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8783216     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00155-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: implications for orthographic processing.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Richard Shillcock
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-09

2.  Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Crossed-uncrossed projections from primate retina are adapted to disparities of natural scenes.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Noah C Benson; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unifying Visual Space Across the Left and Right Hemifields.

Authors:  Zhimin Chen; Anna Kosovicheva; Benjamin Wolfe; Patrick Cavanagh; Andrei Gorea; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-01-18

5.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Giorgio Fuggetta; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev; Mengyun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Functional foveal splitting: evidence from neuropsychological and multimodal MRI investigations in a Chinese patient with a splenium lesion.

Authors:  Benyan Luo; Chunlei Shan; Renjing Zhu; Xuchu Weng; Sheng He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hemifield-specific control of spatial attention and working memory: Evidence from hemifield crossover costs.

Authors:  Roger W Strong; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.