Literature DB >> 8783124

Recurrent intussusception: safe use of hydrostatic enema.

A Fecteau1, H Flageole, L T Nguyen, J M Laberge, K S Shaw, F M Guttman.   

Abstract

Recurrent intussusception (RI) occurs in 5% to 8% of patients with intussusception. The authors reviewed their 15-year experience to better define the management of RI. Among 258 patients, 28 (10.8%) had episodes of RI (37 episodes altogether). Twenty-two patients had a single recurrence, four had double recurrence, one had triple recurrence, and one had quadruple recurrence. RI and non-RI patients were compared with respect to symptoms. The incidence of vomiting and bloody stools was significantly lower in the RI group. Ten percent of RI patients had lead points. Thirty percent of RI episodes occurred within 24 hours, and 74% occurred within 6 months. The success rate of hydrostatic enema reduction for recurrent episodes was 62.8%, which is comparable to that for the initial episode (68.9%). Among patients with previous surgery, 36.3% of enemas were successful; after previous enema reduction, 75% were successful. There was no complication related to the enema. Enema reduction is safe and has a good success rate in cases of RI, even after previous surgical reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8783124     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90154-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  11 in total

Review 1.  Intussusception. Part 3: Diagnosis and management of those with an identifiable or predisposing cause and those that reduce spontaneously.

Authors:  Oscar Navarro; Alan Daneman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-10-08

2.  Laparoscopic reduction of intussusception in children: role in primary and revisional reduction after failed non-surgical therapies.

Authors:  Hamdi H Almaramhy
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2011-01

3.  Clinical characteristics of intussusception secondary to pathologic lead points in children: a single-center experience with 65 cases.

Authors:  Xiao-Kun Lin; Qiong-Zhang Xia; Xiao-Zhong Huang; Yi-Jiang Han; Guo-Rong He; Na Zheng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Does the length of the history influence the outcome of pneumatic reduction of intussusception in children?

Authors:  Farhan Tareen; Stephanie Ryan; Stefano Avanzini; Victor Pena; Danielle Mc Laughlin; Prem Puri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

6.  Early laparoscopy for ileocolic intussusception with multiple recurrences in children.

Authors:  Yu-Tang Chang; Jui-Ying Lee; Jaw-Yuan Wang; Chi-Shu Chiou; Jan-You Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction in the management of intussusception.

Authors:  Shahul Hameed
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.319

8.  Pediatric Intussusception in Northern Iran: Comparison of Recurrent With Non-Recurrent Cases.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Esmaeili-Dooki; Leila Moslemi; Abbas Hadipoor; Soheil Osia; Seyed-Abbas Fatemi
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 0.364

9.  Laparoscopic management of delayed recurrent intussusception in an older child.

Authors:  Rahul J Anand; Sohail R Shah; Timothy D Kane
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Endoscopic Treatment of Jejunal Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa that Caused Recurrent Intussusception.

Authors:  Ke Ryun Ahn; Ja Seol Koo; Hwan Il Kim; Ji Hye Kim; Jee Hyun Lee; Seung Young Kim; Sung Woo Jung; Sang Woo Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.