Literature DB >> 8781920

Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study.

M Chiarugi1, P Buccianti, G Celona, L Decanini, M C Martino, O Goletti, E Cavina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy over open appendicectomy and to evaluate the impact of the severity of appendicitis and of peritonitis on the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.
DESIGN: Prospective unrandomised study.
SETTING: University hospital, Italy.
SUBJECTS: 137 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis, 60 of whom were treated by open and 77 by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients were subdivided according to the severity of appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of operation, consumption of analgesics, duration of hospital stay, overall complications, wound infection.
RESULTS: Hospital stay (median 2.5 days, range 1-18 compared with 4, range 2-22 p < 0.0001). and wound infection (3/77 (4%) compared with 13/60 (22%), p 0.02) were significantly lower after laparoscopic operation. The incidence of wound infection was significantly lower when subgroups were analysed separately.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital stay and wound infection rates were significantly lower after laparoscopic appendicectomy. With the exception of the wound infection rate, the variables studied may differ depending on the severity of the appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis. Result of comparative studies should be carefully interpreted when the two groups are not stratified for these features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8781920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Laura Haas; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyoegg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-08

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients.

Authors:  M Marzouk; M Khater; M Elsadek; A Abdelmoghny
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive techniques in common surgical procedures: implications for training.

Authors:  P H McCormick; W A Tanner; F B V Keane; S Tierney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy.

Authors:  T Nicholson; V Tiruchelvam
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras.

Authors:  D B Nguyen; W Silen; R A Hodin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.