Literature DB >> 8780775

Substrate shuttling between the DnaK and GroEL systems indicates a chaperone network promoting protein folding.

A Buchberger1, H Schröder, T Hesterkamp, H J Schönfeld, B Bukau.   

Abstract

GroEL and DnaK with their cofactors constitute the major chaperone systems promoting protein folding in the Escherichia coli cytosol. The ability of GroEL to bind and promote folding of a substrate released from DnaK led to the proposal that the DnaK and GroEL systems act successively along a protein folding pathway. Here we have investigated the role of both systems in preventing aggregation and assisting refolding of firefly luciferase denatured by guanidinium chloride and heat. We find that DnaK and GroEL compete with each other for binding to non-native luciferase. Addition of ATP and co-operating proteins results in release of luciferase from either chaperone in a non-native conformation. Only a small fraction of luciferase molecules released from GroEL can reach the native state. Instead, the released luciferase must bind repeatedly to the DnaK system, and only then is it able to fold to the native state. Thus, during a folding reaction, DnaK and GroEL do not obligatorily act in succession by promoting earlier and later protein folding steps, respectively. Rather, the two chaperone systems and perhaps others can form a lateral network of co-operating proteins. This chaperone network is proposed to be of particular importance for the assisted refolding of proteins that are unfolded by stress treatment such as heat shock and whose size is too large to allow folding inside the substrate binding cavity of the GroEL ring underneath GroES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8780775     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  27 in total

1.  A small heat shock protein cooperates with heat shock protein 70 systems to reactivate a heat-denatured protein.

Authors:  G J Lee; E Vierling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  GRP94: An HSP90-like protein specialized for protein folding and quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Authors:  Michal Marzec; Davide Eletto; Yair Argon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-11-03

3.  Regulation of the dnaK operon of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) is governed by HspR, an autoregulatory repressor protein.

Authors:  G Bucca; Z Hindle; C P Smith
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Effective cotranslational folding of firefly luciferase without chaperones of the Hsp70 family.

Authors:  Maxim S Svetlov; Aigar Kommer; Vyacheslav A Kolb; Alexander S Spirin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  Toothpicks, serendipity and the emergence of the Escherichia coli DnaK (Hsp70) and GroEL (Hsp60) chaperone machines.

Authors:  Costa Georgopoulos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Compartmentation of protein folding in vivo: sequestration of non-native polypeptide by the chaperonin-GimC system.

Authors:  K Siegers; T Waldmann; M R Leroux; K Grein; A Shevchenko; E Schiebel; F U Hartl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Refolding chromatography with immobilized mini-chaperones.

Authors:  M M Altamirano; R Golbik; R Zahn; A M Buckle; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Chaperome Networks - Redundancy and Implications for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Pengrong Yan; Tai Wang; Monica L Guzman; Radu I Peter; Gabriela Chiosis
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Role of the DnaK and HscA homologs of Hsp70 chaperones in protein folding in E.coli.

Authors:  T Hesterkamp; B Bukau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-08-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.