Literature DB >> 8780475

Subjective assessment of fever by parents: comparison with measurement by noncontact tympanic thermometer and calibrated rectal glass mercury thermometer.

E A Hooker1, S W Smith, T Miles, L King.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of parents to subjectively evaluate their children for fever and to compare their assessments with temperature measurements made with the use of a noncontact tympanic (NCT) or rectal glass mercury thermometer. A secondary goal was to assess how well a recently developed definition of fever for NCT thermometers, when used in the ear-equivalent mode (temperature of 37.7 degrees C or more), performed in a clinical situation.
METHODS: This 6-month prospective observational study employed a convenience sample of 180 children, aged birth to 4 years, who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care children's hospital. Parents were asked to subjectively assess whether their child had a fever. The child's temperature was then measured with an NCT thermometer (three times in the rectal-equivalent mode and three times in the actual-ear mode). Both the subjective assessment and the NCT temperatures were compared with the rectal temperature measured by a rectal glass mercury thermometer.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 14.6 +/- 11.8 months (range, 2 days to 48 months); 56% were boys. The sensitivity of parental detection of fever by subjective means was 81.8% and the specificity 76.5%. The parent and the rectal glass thermometer agreed 79% of the time (95% confidence interval [CI], 73% to 85%). The sensitivity of the first temperature reading obtained with the NCT thermometer in rectal-equivalent mode was 74.7%, and the specificity was 96.3%. The NCT thermometer and the rectal glass thermometer agreed 84% of the time (95% CI, 78% to 89%). Use of the proposed definition of fever for NCT thermometers, when used in the ear-equivalent mode, caused sensitivity of a single measurement for fever to drop to 53.5%.
CONCLUSION: Parental subjective assessment of fever agreed with the presence of fever as measured by rectal glass thermometer in 79% of cases. Specificity was improved with the use of the NCT thermometer. The recently proposed definition for fever for NCT thermometers, when they are used in the ear-equivalent mode, does not appear to be validated by the current data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8780475     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70031-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis of fever by palpation.

Authors:  Anthony Clough
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  Assessment of fever in African children: implication for malaria trials.

Authors:  Sunny Oyakhirome; Katharina Profanter; Peter G Kremsner
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Reliability of perception of fever by touch.

Authors:  Deepti Chaturvedi; K Y Vilhekar; Pushpa Chaturvedi; M S Bharambe
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Accuracy of parents in measuring body temperature with a tympanic thermometer.

Authors:  Joan L Robinson; Hsing Jou; Donald W Spady
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Facing the ongoing challenge of the febrile young infant.

Authors:  Adrienne G DePorre; Paul L Aronson; Russell J McCulloh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  A Cross-Sectional Study on Subjective Fever Assessment in Children by Palpation: Are Fathers as Reliable as Mothers?

Authors:  Ehud Rosenbloom; Crysta Balis; Dustin Jacobson; Melanie Conway; Ji Cheng; Eran Kozer
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 1.112

7.  Reexamining age, race, site, and thermometer type as variables affecting temperature measurement in adults - A comparison study.

Authors:  Linda S Smith
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2003-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.