Literature DB >> 8780285

Prone positioning improves pulmonary function in obese patients during general anesthesia.

P Pelosi1, M Croci, E Calappi, D Mulazzi, M Cerisara, P Vercesi, P Vicardi, L Gattinoni.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of prone position on functional residual capacity (FRC), the mechanical properties (compliance and resistance) of the total respiratory system, lung and chest wall, and the gas exchange in 10 anesthetized and paralyzed obese (body mass index more than 30 kg/m2) patients, undergoing elective surgery. We used the esophageal balloon technique together with rapid airway occlusions during constant inspiratory flow to partition the mechanics of the respiratory system into its pulmonary and chest wall components. FRC was measured by the helium dilution technique. Measurements were taken in the supine position and after 15-30 min of prone position maintaining the same respiratory pattern (tidal volume 12 mL/kg ideal body weight, respiratory rate 14 breaths/ min, fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2]0.4). We found that FRC and lung compliance significantly (P < 0.01) increased from the supine to prone position (0.894 +/- 0.327 L vs 1.980 +/- 0.856 L and 91.4 +/- 55.2 mL/cm H2O vs 109.6 +/- 52.4 mL/cm H2O, respectively). On the contrary, the prone position reduced chest wall compliance (199.5 +/- 58.7 mL/cm H2O vs 160.5 +/- 45.4 mL/cm H2O, P < 0.01), thus total respiratory system compliance did not change. Resistance of the total respiratory system, lung, and chest wall were not modified on turning the patients prone. The increase in FRC and lung compliance was paralleled by a significant (P < 0.01) improvement of PaO2 from supine to prone position (130 +/- 31 vs 181 +/- 28 mm Hg, P < 0.01), while PaCO2 was unchanged. We conclude that, in anesthetized and paralyzed obese subjects, the prone position improves pulmonary function, increasing FRC, lung compliance, and oxygenation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8780285     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199609000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  21 in total

1.  Prone positioning: do not turn it off!

Authors:  Claude Guerin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position?

Authors:  Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov; Ralph V Clayman; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Proning in Non-Intubated (PINI) in Times of COVID-19: Case Series and a Review.

Authors:  Vishesh Paul; Shawn Patel; Michelle Royse; Mazen Odish; Atul Malhotra; Seth Koenig
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 5.  Treatment of ARDS With Prone Positioning.

Authors:  Eric L Scholten; Jeremy R Beitler; G Kim Prisk; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Static pressure volume curves and body posture in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Charis Roussos; Spyros G Zakynthinos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Preoxygenation with 20º head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults.

Authors:  Venkateswaran Ramkumar; Goneppanavar Umesh; Frenny Ann Philip
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Effects of different tidal volumes in pulmonary and extrapulmonary lung injury with or without intraabdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Cíntia L Santos; Lillian Moraes; Raquel S Santos; Mariana G Oliveira; Johnatas D Silva; Tatiana Maron-Gutierrez; Débora S Ornellas; Marcelo M Morales; Vera L Capelozzi; Nelson Jamel; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco; Cristiane S N B Garcia
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Paolo Pelosi; Jan J De Waele; Manu Lng Malbrain; Chad G Ball; Maureen O Meade; Henry T Stelfox; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Environmental perturbations: Obesity.

Authors:  Stephanie A Shore
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.