Literature DB >> 8778689

Case ascertainment for state-based birth defects registries: characteristics of unreported infants ascertained through birth certificates and their impact on registry statistics in New York state.

C L Olsen1, A K Polan, P K Cross.   

Abstract

Cases in the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry are reported by hospitals and physicians. This study was undertaken to determine whether case finding should be expanded to include routine matching of Vital Records files to the registry in order to identify unreported children. Matching of children who were born in 1983-86 and who had a congenital malformation noted on their birth certificate yielded 2837 children who were not in the registry. The hospital of record was asked to submit a registry report if the child's medical record contained a congenital malformation. Medical records for 1267 (45%) of these children indicated that the child was normal, with no mention of a malformation. Medical records could not be located for 137. Registry reports were submitted for 1433, 67 of whom were subsequently found in the registry, leaving 1366 bona fide new cases. These new cases differ significantly from registry cases for a number of birth certificate variables and type of congenital malformation. The birth certificate cases were more likely than registry cases to have only one malformation and to have only a minor malformation. The 1366 new cases comprised 2.1% of all registry cases for 1983-86. Their addition increased the statewide prevalence of major malformations by 1.7% from 416.5 to 423.4 per 10 000 livebirths. Except for anencephaly, the prevalence of specific malformations was not altered measurably by the addition of these cases. Lengthy and continuous follow-up was required to obtain registry reports. The small number of cases found does not seem to justify the amount of resources that would be required to use birth certificates routinely to augment case finding in New York State.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8778689     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1996.tb00040.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  5 in total

1.  Birth defects surveillance: assessing the "gold standard".

Authors:  M A Honein; L J Paulozzi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Hirschsprung's disease and variants in genes that regulate enteric neural crest cell proliferation, migration and differentiation.

Authors:  Tonia C Carter; Denise M Kay; Marilyn L Browne; Aiyi Liu; Paul A Romitti; Devon Kuehn; Mary R Conley; Michele Caggana; Charlotte M Druschel; Lawrence C Brody; James L Mills
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Maternal Chlamydia Infection During Pregnancy and Risk of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Defects in the Offspring.

Authors:  Diane Y Dong; José N Binongo; Vijaya Kancherla
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

4.  The quality of data reported on birth certificates.

Authors:  R S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Descriptive epidemiology of selected birth defects, areas of Lombardy, Italy, 1999.

Authors:  Giovanna Tagliabue; Roberto Tessandori; Fausta Caramaschi; Sabrina Fabiano; Anna Maghini; Andrea Tittarelli; Daniele Vergani; Maria Bellotti; Salvatore Pisani; Maria Letizia Gambino; Emanuela Frassoldi; Enrica Costa; Daniela Gada; Paolo Crosignani; Paolo Contiero
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2007-05-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.