Literature DB >> 8777882

["Open" versus laparoscopic appendectomy].

B Ablassmaier1, S Kiessling, A Pier.   

Abstract

A total of 701 patients operated on with the suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis were included in a prospective study. Three hundred and nine patients were treated conventionally and 387 laparoscopically. In 14 patients the operation had to be converted. Operating time was 44 min in the laparoscopic group and 54 min in the conventional group. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique were better visualisation of the abdominal cavity, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic result. Complications occurred in 2.9% of the patients in the laparoscopic group and in 13.6% of the patients in the conventional group. All complications following laparoscopic procedures could be treated laparoscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8777882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  3 in total

1.  Comparative study of a single-incision laparoscopic and a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Jungwoo Kang; Byung Noe Bae; Geumhee Gwak; Inseok Park; Hyunjin Cho; Keunho Yang; Ki Whan Kim; Sehwan Han; Hong-Joo Kim; Young-Duck Kim
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-31

2.  [Stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Influence of endoloop or linear stapler on patient outcome].

Authors:  M Sohn; M Hoffmann; U Pohlen; J C Lauscher; U Zurbuchen; C Holmer; H J Buhr; K S Lehmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.