Literature DB >> 8777478

Safety of nurse-administered deep sedation for defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory.

A Natale1, M M Kearney, M J Brandon, V Kent, A Wase, K H Newby, E Pisano, M J Geiger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory has been shown to be safe. However, general endotracheal anesthesia and/or administration of sedatives is mostly performed by anesthesiologists. In 53 patients undergoing ICD implantation in the EP laboratory, we prospectively assessed whether deep sedation without endotracheal intubation can be administered by nursing personnel under medical supervision. The mean patient age was 67 +/- 7 years, and the mean ejection fraction was 32 +/- 8%. All ICDs were placed in the abdomen requiring lead tunneling. Patients were monitored with pulse oximetry and noninvasive blood pressure recordings. The level of consciousness and vital signs were evaluated at 5-minute intervals. Deep sedation was induced with phenergan and midazolam and maintained with either meperidine or fentanyl. The mean doses given were as follows: phenergan 0.33 +/- 0.15 mg/kg, midazolam 0.05 +/- 0.03 mg/kg, meperidine 0.46 +/- 0.10 mg/kg per hour, and fentanyl 1.94 +/- 0.71 micrograms/kg per hour. None of the patients required intubation during or after the procedure. No death occurred and no patient had any recollection of the procedure. In three patients, O2 desaturation was easily managed by transient reversion of the effects of meperidine or fentanyl with naloxone. No patient experienced prolonged hospitalization after the implant (mean 2.4 +/- 0.5 days). IN
CONCLUSION: (1) adequate sedation for ICD implantation and testing can be administered safely by nursing staff in the EP lab; (2) optimum sedation protocols should include drugs easy to reverse in case of excessive respiratory depression; and (3) this may represent a more cost-effective approach to ICD implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8777478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of three different automatic defibrillator implantation approaches: pectoral implantation using conscious sedation reduces procedure times and cost.

Authors:  A Bollmann; N K Kanuru; D DeLurgio; P F Walter; J C Burnette; J J Langberg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Old Is (Not) Gold: Midazolam Monotherapy versus Midazolam Plus Fentanyl for Sedation during Cardiac Catheterization.

Authors:  William Black; Raj Baljepally; Laylan Shali; Omar Alsharif; Scott Warden; Eric Heidel; Xiaopeng Zhao
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurses: scope for the future?

Authors:  S Smale; I Bjarnason; I Forgacs; P Prasad; M Mukhood; M Wong; A Ng; H E Mulcahy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel.

Authors:  Anna Kezerashvili; John D Fisher; Jessica DeLaney; Savi Mushiyev; Eileen Monahan; Vanessa Taylor; Soo G Kim; Kevin J Ferrick; Jay N Gross; Eugen C Palma; Andrew K Krumerman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Safe and effective use of conscious sedation for defibrillation threshold testing during ICD implantation.

Authors:  Ahmed Al Fagih; Hitham Al Shurafa; Saleh Al Ghamdi; Khaled Dagriri; Ayman Al Khadra
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-08-08

Review 6.  Anesthesia for cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  A Hamid
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2014
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.