A Foltz1, J Sullivan. 1. Women's Preventive Health Program, Office of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Cancer patients may face a number of obstacles to learning, including complexity of information, inappropriateness of timing and method of presentation, avoidance as a way of coping, and inability to read. Patients' reading levels, preferred learning methods, and desires for information and the usefulness of two instruments in a clinical setting were investigated. One instrument provided information about sociodemographics, desire for information, and learning preferences; the second instrument, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), assessed reading ability. RESULTS: The 63 patients studied, most of whom were African American, wanted all available information (90%), desired participation in care decisions (68%), and preferred personal interactive learning (77%). The REALM mean score was 50.8, indicating a seventh-to-eighth-grade reading level. Over half read below their stated educational levels and would be unable to read most available patient education materials. CONCLUSIONS: Educational level did not indicate reading ability; the patients could state their desires for information and their learning preferences, and the REALM was easy to use.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Cancerpatients may face a number of obstacles to learning, including complexity of information, inappropriateness of timing and method of presentation, avoidance as a way of coping, and inability to read. Patients' reading levels, preferred learning methods, and desires for information and the usefulness of two instruments in a clinical setting were investigated. One instrument provided information about sociodemographics, desire for information, and learning preferences; the second instrument, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), assessed reading ability. RESULTS: The 63 patients studied, most of whom were African American, wanted all available information (90%), desired participation in care decisions (68%), and preferred personal interactive learning (77%). The REALM mean score was 50.8, indicating a seventh-to-eighth-grade reading level. Over half read below their stated educational levels and would be unable to read most available patient education materials. CONCLUSIONS: Educational level did not indicate reading ability; the patients could state their desires for information and their learning preferences, and the REALM was easy to use.
Authors: Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Ruth M Parker; Julie A Gazmararian; Lynn T Nielsen-Bohlman; Rima R Rudd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebekah H Nagler; Anca Romantan; Bridget J Kelly; Robin S Stevens; Stacy W Gray; Shawnika J Hull; A Susana Ramirez; Robert C Hornik Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Ellen M Denzen; Martha E Burton Santibáñez; Heather Moore; Amy Foley; Iris D Gersten; Cathy Gurgol; Navneet S Majhail; Ryan Spellecy; Mary M Horowitz; Elizabeth A Murphy Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Abbey R Roach; Emily L B Lykins; Celestine G Gochett; Emily H Brechting; Lili O Graue; Michael A Andrykowski Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.037